Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:56:52.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dangers of taking capacity limits too literally

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

S. E. Avons ,
Geoff Ward  and
Riccardo Russo
S. E. Avons
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO7 6SJ, United Kingdom [email protected]@[email protected] www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/sa.html www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/gw.html www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/rr.html
Geoff Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO7 6SJ, United Kingdom [email protected]@[email protected] www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/sa.html www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/gw.html www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/rr.html
Riccardo Russo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO7 6SJ, United Kingdom [email protected]@[email protected] www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/sa.html www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/gw.html www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/people/rr.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The empirical data do not unequivocally support a consistent fixed capacity of four chunks. We propose an alternative account whereby capacity is limited by the precision of specifying the temporal and spatial context in which items appear, that similar psychophysical constraints limit number estimation, and that short term memory (STM) is continuous with long term memory (LTM).

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 114 - 115
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)