Article contents
A critique of team and Stackelberg reasoning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2003
Abstract:
Colman's critique of classical game theory is correct, but it is well known. Colman's proposed mechanisms are not plausible. Insufficient reason does what “team reasoning” is supposed to handle, and it applies to a broader set of coordination games. There is little evidence ruling out more traditional alternatives to Stackelberg reasoning, and the latter is implausible when applied to coordination games in general.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003
- 3
- Cited by