No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Conceptual short-term memory (CSTM) supports core claims of Christiansen and Chater
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 June 2016
Abstract
Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) of words or pictured scenes provides evidence for a large-capacity conceptual short-term memory (CSTM) that momentarily provides rich associated material from long-term memory, permitting rapid chunking (Potter 1993; 2009; 2012). In perception of scenes as well as language comprehension, we make use of knowledge that briefly exceeds the supposed limits of working memory.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
References
Chun, M. M. & Potter, M. C. (1995) A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
21:109–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Davenport, J. L. & Potter, M. C. (2004) Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science
15:559–64.Google Scholar
Davenport, J. L. & Potter, M. C. (2005) The locus of semantic priming in RSVP target search. Memory and Cognition
33:241–48.Google Scholar
Endress, A. D. & Potter, M. C. (2014a) Large capacity temporary visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 143(1):548–65. doi: 10.1037/a0033934.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1970) Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception & Psychophysics
8:215–21.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. & Davis, C. (1984) Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
10:680–698.Google Scholar
Intraub, H. (1981) Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
7:604–10.Google Scholar
Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1980) Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science
207:203–205.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. (1971a) Temporal numerosity estimates for word lists. Perception and Psychophysics
10:75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. (1971b) Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation. Perception and Psychophysics
10:85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, G. R. (1983) Eye fixations on text and scenes. In: Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes, ed. Rayner, K., pp. 359–76. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lombardi, L. & Potter, M. C. (1992) The regeneration of syntax in short term memory. Journal of Memory and Language
31:713–33.Google Scholar
Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K. & Shapiro, K. L. (1996) Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature
383:616–18.Google Scholar
Meng, M. & Potter, M. C. (2008) Detecting and remembering pictures with and without visual noise. Journal of Vision
8(9):7. Available at: http://journalofvision.org/8/9/7/
Google Scholar
Meng, M. & Potter, M. C. (2011) An attentional blink for nontargets?
Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
73:440–46.Google Scholar
Neely, J. H. (1991) Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In: Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition, ed. Besner, D. & Humphreys, G. W., pp. 264–36. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. (1976) Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
2:509–22.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. (1984) Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In: New methods in reading comprehension research, ed. Kieras, D. & Just, M., pp. 91–18. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. (1993) Very short-term conceptual memory. Memory and Cognition
21:156–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, M. C. (2012) Conceptual short term memory in perception and thought. Frontiers in Psychology
3:113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, M. C. & Faulconer, B. A. (1975) Time to understand pictures and words. Nature
253:437–38.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. & Lombardi, L. (1990) Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language
29:633–54.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C. & Lombardi, L. (1998) Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language
38:265–82.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F. & Harris, C. (1980) Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. In: Attention and Performance VIII, ed. Nickerson, R., pp. 395–18. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F., Yachzel, B., Carpenter, E. & Sherman, J. (1986) Pictures in sentences: Understanding without words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
115:281–94.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Moryadas, A., Abrams, I. & Noel, A. (1993) Word perception and misperception in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
19:3–22.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Staub, A. & O'Connor, D. H. (2002) The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
28:1149–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Potter, M. C., Stiefbold, D. & Moryadas, A. (1998) Word selection in reading sentences: Preceding versus following contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
24:68–100.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Valian, V. V. & Faulconer, B. A. (1977) Representation of a sentence and its pragmatic implications: Verbal, imagistic, or abstract?
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
16:1–12.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Wyble, B., Hagmann, C. E. & McCourt, E. S. (2014) Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Attention, Perception, and Performance
76(2):270–79. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0605-z.Google Scholar
Potter, M. C., Wyble, B., Pandav, R. & Olejarczyk, J. (2010) Picture detection in RSVP: Features or identity?
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
36:1486–94.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., ed. (1983) Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., ed. (1992) Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. Springer.Google Scholar
Sperling, G., Budiansky, J., Spivak, J. G. & Johnson, M. C. (1971) Extremely rapid visual search: The maximum rate of scanning letters for the presence of a numeral. Science
174:307–11.Google Scholar
Target article
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
Related commentaries (28)
Better late than Now-or-Never: The case of interactive repair phenomena
Conceptual short-term memory (CSTM) supports core claims of Christiansen and Chater
Consequences of the Now-or-Never bottleneck for signed versus spoken languages
Exploring some edges: Chunk-and-Pass processing at the very beginning, across representations, and on to action
Gestalt-like representations hijack Chunk-and-Pass processing
How long is now? The multiple timescales of language processing
Is Now-or-Never language processing good enough?
Language acquisition is model-based rather than model-free
Language processing is not a race against time
Linguistic representations and memory architectures: The devil is in the details
Linguistic structure emerges through the interaction of memory constraints and communicative pressures
Linguistics, cognitive psychology, and the Now-or-Never bottleneck
Many important language universals are not reducible to processing or cognition
Mechanisms for interaction: Syntax as procedures for online interactive meaning building
Memory limitations and chunking are variable and cannot explain language structure
Natural language processing and the Now-or-Never bottleneck
Neural constraints and flexibility in language processing
Now or … later: Perceptual data are not immediately forgotten during language processing
On the generalizability of the Chunk-and-Pass processing approach: Perspectives from language acquisition and music
Pro and con: Internal speech and the evolution of complex language
Processing cost and its consequences
Realizing the Now-or-Never bottleneck and Chunk-and-Pass processing with Item-Order-Rank working memories and masking field chunking networks
Reservoir computing and the Sooner-is-Better bottleneck
Socio-demographic influences on language structure and change: Not all learners are the same
The bottleneck may be the solution, not the problem
The ideomotor recycling theory for language
What gets passed in “Chunk-and-Pass” processing? A predictive processing solution to the Now-or-Never bottleneck
“Process and perish” or multiple buffers with push-down stacks?
Author response
Squeezing through the Now-or-Never bottleneck: Reconnecting language processing, acquisition, change, and structure