Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:01:02.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing views of feedforward and feedback in voluntary movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

J. A. Scott Kelso
J. A. Scott Kelso
Affiliation:
Motor Behavior Laboratory, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 1978 , pp. 153 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, J. A.A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior. 3(2): 111–49. 1971.Google Scholar
Issues for a closed-loop theory of motor learning. In: Stelmach, G. E. (ed.) Motor control: Issues and trends pp. 87–108. Academic Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Bairstow, P. J., and Laszlo, J. IThe nerve compression block technique: A reply to Kelso, Stelmach, and Wanamaker. Journal of Motor Behavior. 8:147–53. 1976.Google Scholar
Bizzi, E. Common problems confronting eye movement physiologists and investigators of somatic motor functions. Brain Research. 71: 191–94. 1974.Google Scholar
Bizzi, E., and Polit, A.Processes controlling visually evoked movements. Neuropsychologia, in press.Google Scholar
Bizzi, E, Polit, A., and Morasso, P.Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position, Journal of Neurophysiology. 39(2): 435–44. 1976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, V. B.Some examples of programmed limb movements. Brain Research 71:299–308. 1974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evarts, E. V., and Fromm, C.Sensory responses in motor cortex neurons during precise motor control. Neuroscience Letters. 5:267–72. 1977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fel‘dman, A. G.Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture - III. Mechanographic analysis of the execution by man of the simplest motor tasks. Biophysics. 11:766–75. 1966.Google Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S.Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance. 3:529–43. 1977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelso, J. A. S. and Stelmach, G. E. Central and peripheral mechanisms in motor control. In: Stelmach, G. E. (ed.) Motor control: Issues and trends, pp. 1–40. Academic Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S., Stelmach, G. E. and Wanamaker, W. H.Behavioral and neurological parameters of the nerve compression block. Journal of Motor Behavior. 6: 179–90. 1974.Google Scholar
The continuing saga of the nerve compression block technique. Journal of Motor Behavior 8:155–60. 1976.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. B. C.Muscle afferents and kinaesthesia. British Medical Bulletin. 33(2): 137–42. 1977.Google Scholar
Taub, E., Goldberg, I. A., and Taub, P.Deafferentation in monkeys: Pointing at a target without visual feedback. Experimental Neurology. 46:178–86. 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar