Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:00:52.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Change blindness, Gibson, and the sensorimotor theory of vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2002

Brian J. Scholl  and
Daniel J. Simons
Brian J. Scholl
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205 [email protected] http://pantheon.yale.edu/~bs265
Daniel J. Simons
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~viscog/lab/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We suggest that the sensorimotor “theory” of vision is really an unstructured collection of separate ideas, and that much of the evidence cited in its favor at best supports only a subset of these ideas. As an example, we note that work on change blindness does not “vindicate” (or even speak to) much of the sensorimotor framework. Moreover, the ideas themselves are not always internally consistent. Finally, the proposed framework draws on ideas initially espoused by James Gibson, but does little to differentiate itself from those earlier views. For even part of this framework to become testable, it must specify which sources of evidence can support or contradict each of the component hypotheses.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 1004 - 1006
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)