Article contents
A biased survey and interpretation of the nature–nurture literature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 June 1998
Abstract
This commentary samples some of the major bodies of counterevidence omitted by Howe et al., including the strong relationship between IQ and academic excellence, the limited effects of early stimulation programs, and the measurement of musical aptitudes. The authors' selective review and analysis of the surveyed literature, especially studies of prodigies and in behavioral genetics, is discussed.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1998 Cambridge University Press
- 7
- Cited by