Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:49:38.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond response output: More logical than we think

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Wim De Neys
Wim De Neys
Affiliation:
Lab for Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. [email protected]://ppw.kuleuven.be/reason/wim/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Oaksford & Chater (O&C) rely on a data fitting approach to show that a Bayesian model captures the core reasoning data better than its logicist rivals. The problem is that O&C's modeling has focused exclusively on response output data. I argue that this exclusive focus is biasing their conclusions. Recent studies that focused on the processes that resulted in the response selection are more positive for the role of logic.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 87 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, L. J., Philips, P., Wade, C. N. & Quayle, J. D. (2006) Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models. Experimental Psychology 53:77–86.Google Scholar
De Neys, W., & Franssens, S. (2007) The nature of belief inhibition during thinking: How reasoning impairs memory. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 29:8.Google Scholar
De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008) Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition 106:1248–99.Google Scholar
De Neys, W., Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2008) Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased. Psychological Science 19:483–89.Google Scholar
Hoffrage, U. (2000) Why the analyses of cognitive processes matter. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:679–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houdé, O., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Moutier, S., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B. & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2000) Shifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: The neural impact of cognitive inhibition training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12:721–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (2007) Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar