Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:13:26.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The art of representation: Support for an enactive approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2004

Natika Newton
Natika Newton*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Nassau Hall, Nassau Community College, Garden City, NY 11733
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Grush makes an important contribution to a promising way of viewing mental representation: as a component activity in sensorimotor processes. Grush shows that there need be no entities in our heads that would count as representations, but that, nevertheless, the process of representation can be defined so as to include both natural and artificial (e.g., linguistic or pictorial) representing.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , June 2004 , pp. 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)