Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T01:32:06.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Area, surface, and contour: Psychophysical correlates of three classes of pictorial completion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

Birgitta Dresp
Birgitta Dresp
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Psychophysique Sensorielle, EP 618 du C.N.R.S., Université Louis Pasteur, 67000 Strasbourg, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple working taxonomy with three classes of pictorial completion is proposed as an alternative to Pessoa et al.'s classification: area, surface, and contour completion. The classification is based on psychophysical evidence, not on the different phenomenal attributes of the stimuli, showing that pictorial completion is likely to involve mechanistic interactions in the visual system at different levels of processing. Whether the concept of “filling-in” is an appropriate metaphor for the visual mechanisms that may underlie perceptual completion is questioned.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 1998 , pp. 755 - 756
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)