Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:58:46.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's reason got to do with it? Affect as the foundation of learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Eliza Bliss-Moreau  and
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Eliza Bliss-Moreau
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, California National Primate Research Center, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA [email protected]
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA [email protected]/edu/~barretli Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose that learning has a top-down component, but not in the propositional terms described by Mitchell et al. Specifically, we propose that a host of learning processes, including associative learning, serve to imbue the representation of the conditioned stimulus (CS) with affective meaning.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 201 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar, M. (2003) A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15:600–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar, M. (2007) The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(7):280–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. F. & Bar, M. (in press) Seeing it with feeling: Affective predictions about “what” and “where” in the human brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. & Bliss-Moreau, E. (in press) Affect as a psychological primitive. Advances in Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59:617–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(1):255–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, H., Janssen, E. & Turner, S. L. (2004) Classical conditioning of sexual arousal in women and men: Effects of varying awareness and biological relevance of the conditioned stimulus. Archives of Sexual Behavior 33:43–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A. S. & Bar, M. (2007) Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition 65:145–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann, D. L. & Waters, A. M. (2006) The use of an unpleasant sound as an unconditional stimulus in a human aversive Pavlovian conditioning procedure. Biological Psychology 73:175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, A. & Phelps, E. A. (2004) Learned fear of “unseen” faces after Pavlovian, observational, and instructed fear. Psychological Science 15:822–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vervliet, B., Vansteenwegen, D., Baeyens, F., Hermans, D. & Helen, P. (2005) Return of fear in a human differential conditioning paradigm caused by a stimulus change after extinction. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43:357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar