Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:57:29.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

We are better off without perfect perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Eli Brenner  and
Jeroen B. J. Smeets
Eli Brenner
Affiliation:
Vakgroep Fysiologie, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The [email protected]
Jeroen B. J. Smeets
Affiliation:
Vakgroep Fysiologie, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stoffregen & Bardy's target article is based on the assumption that our senses' ultimate purpose is to provide us with perfect information about the outside world. We argue that it is often more important that information be available quickly than that it be perfect. Consequently our nervous system processes different aspects of information about our surrounding as separately as possible. The separation is not between the senses, but between separate aspects of our surrounding. This results in inconsistencies between judgments: sometimes because different frames of reference are used. Such inconsistencies are fundamental to the way the information is picked up, however, and hence cannot be avoided with clearer instructions to the subjects.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 215 - 216
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)