Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:30:41.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the development of folk-economic beliefs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2018

Zoe Liberman  and
Katherine D. Kinzler
Zoe Liberman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9660. [email protected]/liberman/zoe
Katherine D. Kinzler
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853-7601. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Developmental psychology can shed light on (1) the intuitive systems that underlie folk-economic beliefs (FEBs), and (2) how FEBs are created and revised. Boyer & Petersen (B&P) acknowledge the first, but we argue that they do not seriously consider the second. FEBs vary across people (and within a person), and much of this variation may be explained by socialization, social context, and social learning.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloom, P. (1996) Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 60(1):1–29.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1994) Better than rational: Evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand. The American Economic Review 84(2):327–32.Google Scholar
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M. & Armstrong, T. L. (2001) The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues 57(3):389–412.Google Scholar
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K. & Bloom, P. (2007) Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450(7169):557–59.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D. & Dautel, J. B. (2012) Children's essentialist reasoning about language and race. Developmental Science 15(1):131–38.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E. & Spelke, E. S. (2007) The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104(30):12577–80.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (2001) Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98(26):15387–92.Google Scholar
Liberman, Z., Kinzler, K. D. & Woodward, A. L. (2014) Friends or foes: Infants use shared evaluations to infer others' social relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(3):966–71.Google Scholar
Liberman, Z. & Shaw, A. (2017) Children use partial resource sharing as a cue to friendship. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 159:96–109.Google Scholar
Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L. & Kinzler, K. D. (2017) The origins of social categorization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(7):556–68.Google Scholar
Mahajan, N. & Wynn, K. (2012) Origins of “us” versus “them”: Prelinguistic infants prefer similar others. Cognition 124(2):227–33.Google Scholar
Pauker, K., Ambady, N. & Apfelbaum, E. P. (2010) Race salience and essentialist thinking in racial stereotype development. Child Development 81(6):1799–813.Google Scholar
Pauker, K., Xu, Y., Williams, A. & Biddle, A. M. (2016) Race essentialism and social contextual differences in children's racial stereotyping. Child Development 87(5):1409–22.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2012) Who deserves help? Evolutionary psychology, social emotions, and public opinion about welfare. Political Psychology 33(3):395–418.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. & Gelman, S. A. (2009) A developmental examination of the conceptual structure of animal, artifact, and human social categories across two cultural contexts. Cognitive Psychology 59(3):244–74.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. (2013) Beyond “to share or not to share” The impartiality account of fairness. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22(5):413–17.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (1998) Dutch public opinion on social security. CRSP Series. Centre for Research in Social Policy.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2006) Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1):23–42.Google Scholar