Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:38:52.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Michele J. Gelfand ,
Patrick Roos ,
Dana Nau ,
Jesse Harrington ,
Yan Mu  and
Joshua Jackson
Michele J. Gelfand
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. [email protected]@[email protected]@umd.eduwww.gelfand.umd.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/jharringtonumd/
Patrick Roos
Affiliation:
Miner & Kasch, 334 Scherer Lane, Severna Park, MD 21146. [email protected]
Dana Nau
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. [email protected]://www.cs.umd.edu/users/nau
Jesse Harrington
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. [email protected]@[email protected]@umd.eduwww.gelfand.umd.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/jharringtonumd/
Yan Mu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. [email protected]@[email protected]@umd.eduwww.gelfand.umd.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/jharringtonumd/
Joshua Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. [email protected]@[email protected]@umd.eduwww.gelfand.umd.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/jharringtonumd/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As scholars have rushed to either prove or refute cultural group selection (CGS), the debate lacks sufficient consideration of CGS's potential moderators. We argue that pressures for CGS are particularly strong when groups face ecological and human-made threat. Field, experimental, computational, and genetic evidence are presented to substantiate this claim.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e38
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. & Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, K., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D'Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., Fischer, R., Fulop, M., Georgas, J., Kashima, E. S., Kashima, Y., Kim, K., Lempereur, A., Marquez, P., Othman, R., Overlaet, B., Panagiotopoulou, P., Peltzer, K., Perez-Florizno, L. R., Ponomarenko, L., Realo, A., Schei, V., Schmitt, M., Smith, P. B., Soomro, N., Szabo, E., Taveesin, N., Toyama, M., Van de Vliert, E., Vohra, N., Ward, C. & Yamaguchi, S. (2011) Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science 332:1100–104.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. & Gelfand, M. J. (2014) Tightness-looseness across the U.S. 50 states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111:7990–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilbe, C. & Traulsen, A. (2012) Emergence of responsible sanctions without second order free riders, antisocial punishment or spite. Scientific Reports 2, Article No. 458. Published Online, June 13, 2012. doi: 10.1036/srep00458.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P. & Soto, C. J. (2008) Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 3:114–58.Google Scholar
Mrazek, A. J., Chiao, J. Y., Blizinsky, K. D., Lun, J. & Gelfand, M. J. (2013) The role of culture–gene coevolution in morality judgment: Examining the interplay between tightness–looseness and allelic variation of the serotonin transporter gene. Culture and Brain 1(2–4):100–117.Google Scholar
Mu, Y., Kitayama, S., Han, S., & Gelfand, M. J. (2015) How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112(50):15348–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509839112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roos, P., Gelfand, M., Nau, D. & Carr, R. (2014) High strength-of-ties and low mobility enable the evolution of third-party punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1776): Article no. 2661. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2661.Google ScholarPubMed
Roos, P., Gelfand, M. J., Nau, D. & Lun, J. (2015) Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 129:14–23.Google Scholar