Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T10:42:05.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The social cognitive evolution of myths: Collective narratives of shared pasts as markers for coalitions' communicative and cooperative prowess

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

Wouter Wolf Open the ORCID record for Wouter Wolf [Opens in a new window]
Wouter Wolf*
Affiliation:
Department of Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To understand why humans put much effort into celebrating cultural myths, it is crucial to approach this phenomenon as part of humans' broader social cognitive evolution. Specifically, humans' unique capacity to bond with others through shared/collective representations of shared experiences has likely caused individuals to use myths to assess not only coalitions' fitness interdependence, but also their cooperative prowess.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e195
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bratman, M. E. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104(1), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90189-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., Teasdale, B., Thompson, J., Budelmann, F., Duncan, S., van Emde Boas, E., & Maguire, L. (2016). Emotional arousal when watching drama increases pain threshold and social bonding. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160288. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kern, A., & Moll, H. (2017). On the transformative character of collective intentionality and the uniqueness of the human. Philosophical Psychology, 30(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2017.1295648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennung, M., & Göritz, A. S. (2015). Facing sorrow as a group unites. Facing sorrow in a group divides. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shteynberg, G., Hirsh, J. B., Wolf, W., Bargh, J. A., Boothby, E. J., Colman, A. M., … Rossignac-Milon, M. (2023). Theory of collective mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(11), 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.06.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human. A theory of ontogeny. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00573.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Melis, A., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1086/668207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 18(2), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, W., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2015). Joint attention, shared goals, and social bonding. British Journal of Psychology, 107(2), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, W., & Tomasello, M. (2019). Visually attending to a video together facilitates great ape social closeness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286(1907), 20190488. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, W., & Tomasello, M. (2020a). Human children, but not great apes become socially closer by sharing an experience in common ground. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 199, 104930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, W., & Tomasello, M. (2020b). Watching a video together creates social closeness between children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 189, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104712CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, W., & Tomasello, M. (2023). A shared intentionality account of uniquely human social bonding. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231201795CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed