No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Pros and cons of blurring gesture-language lines: An evolutionary linguistic perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 April 2017
Abstract
The target article's emphasis on distinguishing sign from gesture may resolve one important objection to gesture-first theories of language evolution. However, this approach risks undervaluing the gradual progression from nonlanguage to language over hominin evolution, and in emerging sign systems today. I call for less emphasis on drawing boundaries and more emphasis on understanding the processes of change.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Arbib, M. A. (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
28(02):105–24.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2003) From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Queiroz, K. (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology
56(6):879–86.Google Scholar
Hewes, G. W. (1973) Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Current Anthropology
12(1–2):5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, D. E., Irwin, J. H. & Price, T. D. (2001) Ring species as bridges between microevolution and speciation. Genetica
112(1):223–43.Google Scholar
McNeill, D., Duncan, S. D., Cole, J., Gallagher, S. & Bertenthal, B. (2008) Growth points from the very beginning. Interaction Studies
9(1):117–32.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (submitted) What comes first in language emergence? In: Dependencies in language: On the causal ontology of linguistic systems, ed. Nick, E.. Language Science Press, Studies in Diversity Linguistics Series.Google Scholar
Target article
Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies
Related commentaries (27)
An evolutionary approach to sign language emergence: From state to process
Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning
Building a single proposition from imagistic and categorical components
Current and future methodologies for quantitative analysis of information transfer in sign language and gesture data
Emoticons in text may function like gestures in spoken or signed communication
Gesture or sign? A categorization problem
Gestures can create diagrams (that are neither imagistic nor analog)
Good things come in threes: Communicative acts comprise linguistic, imagistic, and modifying components
How to distinguish gesture from sign: New technology is not the answer
Iconic enrichments: Signs vs. gestures
Is it language (yet)? The allure of the gesture-language binary
Language readiness and learning among deaf children
Languages as semiotically heterogenous systems
Perspectives on gesture from autism spectrum disorder: Alterations in timing and function
Pros and cons of blurring gesture-language lines: An evolutionary linguistic perspective
Same or different: Common pathways of behavioral biomarkers in infants and children with neurodevelopmental disorders?
Sign, language, and gesture in the brain: Some comments
The categorical role of structurally iconic signs
The influence of communication mode on written language processing and beyond
The physiognomic unity of sign, word, and gesture
Toward true integration
Understanding gesture in sign and speech: Perspectives from theory of mind, bilingualism, and acting
Vocal laughter punctuates speech and manual signing: Novel evidence for similar linguistic and neurological mechanisms
What is a gesture? A lesson from comparative gesture research
Where does (sign) language begin?
Why space is not one-dimensional: Location may be categorical and imagistic
Why would the discovery of gestures produced by signers jeopardize the experimental finding of gesture-speech mismatch?
Author response
Gesture and language: Distinct subsystem of an integrated whole