Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:40:24.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political bias is tenacious

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Peter H. Ditto ,
Sean P. Wojcik ,
Eric Evan Chen ,
Rebecca Hofstein Grady  and
Megan M. Ringel
Peter H. Ditto
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7085. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/phdittowww.seanwojcik.comhttp://gradyr.weebly.com/
Sean P. Wojcik
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7085. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/phdittowww.seanwojcik.comhttp://gradyr.weebly.com/
Eric Evan Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7085. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/phdittowww.seanwojcik.comhttp://gradyr.weebly.com/
Rebecca Hofstein Grady
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7085. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/phdittowww.seanwojcik.comhttp://gradyr.weebly.com/
Megan M. Ringel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7085. [email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/phdittowww.seanwojcik.comhttp://gradyr.weebly.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Duarte et al. are right to worry about political bias in social psychology but they underestimate the ease of correcting it. Both liberals and conservatives show partisan bias that often worsens with cognitive sophistication. More non-liberals in social psychology is unlikely to speed our convergence upon the truth, although it may broaden the questions we ask and the data we collect.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e140
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, S. I., Gomes, B. & Abramowitz, C. V. (1975) Publish or politic: Referee bias in manuscript review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 5(3):187–200. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1975.tb00675.x.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H. & Lopez, D. F. (1992) Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(4):568–84.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M. & Lockhart, L. K. (1998) Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75:53–69.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L. & Kawakami, K. (2003) The contact hypothesis: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6:5–21. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001009.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (2012) There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7:99–108.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. & Westwood, S. J. (2014) Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science. Advanced Online publication. doi:10.1111/ajps.12152. Available at: http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/advance-online-publication/; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12152/abstract Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):339–75. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C. & Slovic P. (2013) Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper, No. 307. [Yale University, September 3, 2013. Posted Online at Social Science Research Network, September 8, 2013.] Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992; http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2319992 Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. (1974) The science and politics of IQ. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Liu, B., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E., Grady, R. & Ditto, P. H. (2014) Motivated reasoning and ideology: A meta-analysis of liberals' and conservatives' bias in political contexts. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology (ISPP), Rome, Italy, July 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Lord, C. G. & Taylor, C. A. (2009) Biased assimilation: Effects of assumptions and expectations on the interpretation of new evidence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3:827–41. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCoun, R. J. (1998) Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annual Review of Psychology 49(1):259–87. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M. J. (1977) Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1:161–75. doi:10.1007/BF01173636.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22(11):1359–66.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50:755–69. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.Google Scholar
West, R. F., Meserve, R. J. & Stanovich, K. E. (2012) Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103:506–19. doi:10.1037/a0028857.Google Scholar