No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On correspondence, accuracy, and truth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
Koriat & Goldsmith raise important questions about memory, but there is need for caution: first, if we define accuracy by output measures, there is a danger that a perfectly accurate memory can be nearly useless. Second, when we focus on correspondence, there is a danger that syntactic correspondence will be mistaken for historical truth.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996