No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2004
This commentary examines Glenberg's characterization of “suppression” in light of negative priming and related phenomena. After offering a radically different slant on suppression, an attempt is made to weave this alternative version into Glenberg's provocative discussion of embodied memories.
Commentary on Arthur M. Glenberg (1997). What memory is for. BBS 20(1):1–19.