Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:11:23.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberal bias and the five-factor model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Evan Charney
Evan Charney*
Affiliation:
Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708. [email protected]://sites.duke.edu/evancharney/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Duarte et al. draw attention to the “embedding of liberal values and methods” in social psychological research. They note how these biases are often invisible to the researchers themselves. The authors themselves fall prey to these “invisible biases” by utilizing the five-factor model of personality and the trait of openness to experience as one possible explanation for the under-representation of political conservatives in social psychology. I show that the manner in which the trait of openness to experience is conceptualized and measured is a particularly blatant example of the very liberal bias the authors decry.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burke, E. (1881/1997) Reflections on the Revolution in France. In: Conservatism: An anthology of social and political thought from David Hume to the present, ed. Muller, J. Z., pp. 83–122. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, T. P. & McCrae, R. R. (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):339–75. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.Google Scholar
Knowles, E. (2006) Permissive society. In: The Oxford Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, ed. Knowles, E.. [Second edition, Online]. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.encyclopedia.com.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1996) Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin 120:323–37.Google Scholar