Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:56:53.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrating evolutionary and social science approaches to the family

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2010

Donald Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467. [email protected]://www2.bc.edu/~coxdo/

Abstract

Recent work on the evolution of utility has brought the blunt instrument of kin selection closer to the cluttered scalpel kit of social science. The concept of diminishing marginal utility can help streamline the latter. Reconciling ultimate causes with proximate inclinations, however, will be easier for the case of assistance from grandparents than assistance to them.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alger, I. & Weibull, J. (forthcoming) Kinship, incentives and evolution. American Economic Review.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T. C. (1997) Economics in a family way. Journal of Economic Literature 34:1903–34.Google Scholar
Cox, D. & Fafchamps, M. (2008) Extended family and kinship networks: Economic insights and evolutionary directions. In: Handbook of development economics, vol. 4, ed. Schultz, T. P. & Strauss, J., pp. 3711–84. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cox, D. & Stark, O. (2005) On the demand for grandchildren: Tied transfers and the demonstration effect. Journal of Public Economics 89:1666–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perozek, M. G. (1998) A reexamination of the strategic bequest motive. Journal of Political Economy 106:423–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloan, F. A., Picone, G. & Hoerger, T. J. (1997) The supply of children's time to disabled elderly parents. Economic Inquiry 35:295308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar