No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
From reifying mental pictures to reifying spatial models
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 February 2005
Abstract:
Assuming that the vehicle of imaginal thought is a spatial model may not be quite as egregious an error as assuming it is a two-dimensional picture, but it represents no less a reification error. Because the model is not a literal physical layout, one is still owed an explanation of why spatial properties hold in the model – whether because of architectural constraints or by stipulation. The difference is like the difference between explaining behavior from a principle and predicting it by looking it up in a list. In the latter case no purpose is being served by calling it a mental model.
- Type
- Author's Response
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004
Footnotes
Commentary onZenon W. Pylyshyn (2002). Mental imagery? In search of a theory. BBS 25(2):157–182.
References
Anderson, J. (1978) Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review 85:249–77. [MK]Google Scholar
Baker, S. C., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J. & Dolan, R. J. (1996) Active representation of shape and spatial location in man. Cerebral Cortex 6:612–19. [MK]Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D. & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension: In: Visual information processing, ed. Chase, W.. Academic Press. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J. & O’Keefe, J. (2001) A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events. NeuroImage 14:439–53. [MK]Google Scholar
Goel, V. & Dolan, R. J. (2001) Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning. Neuropsychologia 39:901–909. [MK]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J. & Tabossi, P. (1989) Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantifiers. Psychological Review 96:658–73. [MK]Google Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R. & Meiser, T. (1997) Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 3:9–47. [MK]Google Scholar
Knauff, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002) Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory and Cognition 30:363–71. [MK]Google Scholar
Knauff, M., Jola, C., Strube, G., Rauh, R. & Schlieder, C. (2004) The psychological validity of qualitative spatial reasoning in one dimension. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4:167–88. [MK]Google Scholar
Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R. & Greenlee, M. W. (2002) Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 13:203–12. [MK]Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984) Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. MIT Press. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.) (1987) The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Ablex. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003) Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Schlieder, C. (1998) Diagrammatic transformation processes on two-dimensional relational maps. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 9:45–59. [MK]Google Scholar
Vandierendonck, A. & de Vooght, G. (1997) Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with temporal and spatial contents. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A:803–20. [MK]Google Scholar
Xing, J. & Andersen, R. A. (2000) Models of the posterior parietal cortex which perform multimodal integration and represent space in several coordinate frames. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12:601–14. [MK]Google Scholar