Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:19:03.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution in the symbolic dimension: The devil is in the details

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2007

Susan Lappan  and
Jae Chun Choe
Susan Lappan
Affiliation:
Department of EcoSciences, Ewha Womans University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, Republic of Korea. [email protected]@ewha.ac.krhttp://home.ewha.ac.kr/~behaveco
Jae Chun Choe
Affiliation:
Department of EcoSciences, Ewha Womans University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, Republic of Korea. [email protected]@ewha.ac.krhttp://home.ewha.ac.kr/~behaveco
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolution in Four Dimensions argues convincingly that non-genetic inheritance systems have the potential to be agents of evolution and that, in some circumstances, acquired information can be heritable. However, we found the authors' four-dimensional approach to evolution problematic, and doubt that symbolic evolution can be adequately modeled as a distinct dimension of organismal evolution.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 373 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caramelli, D., Lalueza-Fox, C., Vernesi, C., Lari, M., Casoli, A., Mallegni, F., Chiarelli, B., Dupanloup, I., Bertranpetit, J., Barbujani, G. & Bertorelle, G. (2003) Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neandertals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:6583–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Serre, D., Langaney, A., Chech, M., Maria Teschler-Nicola, M, Paunovic, M, Mennecier, P, Hofreiters, M, Possnert, G.,& Pääbo, S. (2004) No evidence of Neandertal mtDNA contribution to early modern humans. PLoS Biology 2:e57. DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R. R., Oden, N. L., Walker, J. & Waddle, D. M. (1997) Using distance matrices to choose between competing theories and an application to the origin of modern humans. Journal of Human Evolution 32:501–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar