Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T18:46:44.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence both for and against metacognition is insufficient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2004

Thomas R. Zentall
Thomas R. Zentall*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY40506http://www.uky.edu/AS/Psychology/faculty/tzentall.html
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The authors' attempt to explore the ability of animals to monitor how certain they are of their choice behavior, necessarily fails both in their effort to include “higher” mammals (such as monkeys and dolphins) in the class of metacognitive organisms (humans) and in their conclusion that “lower” organisms are not capable of similar behavior.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , June 2003 , pp. 357 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)