Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:26:40.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic and psychological experimental methodology: Separating the wheat from the chaff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2001

Hasker P. Davis  and
Robert L. Durham
Hasker P. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80933 [email protected]@brain.uccs.edu www.web.uccs.edu/hdavis www.web.uccs.edu/rdurham
Robert L. Durham
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO 80933 [email protected]@brain.uccs.edu www.web.uccs.edu/hdavis www.web.uccs.edu/rdurham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hertwig and Ortmann suggest methodological practices from economics (script enactment, repeated measures, performance based payments, and absence of deception) for psychology. Such prescriptive methodologies may be unrepresentative of real world behaviors because people are not: always behaving with complete information, monetarily rewarded for important activities, repeating tasks to perfection, aware of all contributing variables. These proscriptions, while useful in economics, may obfuscate important psychological phenomena.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 2001 , pp. 405 - 406
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)