Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:21:36.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detecting deception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

Kenneth J. Gergen
Kenneth J. Gergen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19086 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I find three major shortcomings in Mele's account. First, verbal ambiguities suggest that the analysis is irrelevant to self-deception and/or that the traditional conception is subtly reinstated. Second, the data offer no means of establishing the superiority of the present account. Finally, as political rhetoric, Mele's proposal not only operates to disqualify others, but establishes science as their judge.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 114 - 115
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)