No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cultural variations on the SIMS model
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2010
Abstract
Niedenthal et al. recognize that cultural differences are important when interpreting facial expressions. Nonetheless, many of their core observations derive more from individualistic cultures than from collectivist cultures. We discuss two examples from the latter: (1) lower rates of mutual eye contact, and (2) the ubiquity of specific “functional smiles.” These examples suggest constraints on the assumptions and applicability of the SIMS model.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
References
Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D. & Caldara, R. (2008) Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE
3(8):e3022. [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T. & Larsen, J. (2003) Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science
14:201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H. & Fontaine, J. (2008) Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
39(1):55–74.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W. & Peng, K. (1994) Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
64(6):949–71.Google Scholar
Wiseman, R. L. & Pan, X. (2004) Smiling in the People's Republic of China and the United States: Status and situational influences on the social appropriateness of smiling. Intercultural Communication Studies
13(1):1–18.Google Scholar
Target article
Cultural variations on the SIMS model
Related commentaries (1)
The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression