No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Creating shared goals and experiences as a pathway to peace
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2024
Abstract
Glowacki offers many new directions for understanding and even eliminating the problem of war, especially creating positive interdependencies with out-group members. We develop Glowacki's intriguing proposition that in-group dynamics provide a route to peace by describing a prosocial motivational system, the caregiving system, that aligns individual interests and eliminates the need to use coercion to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. M., Brown, S. L., Knickrehm, K., & Teske, R. (2005, March). An interdisciplinary perspective on ethnic conflicts: The role of social bonds and altruism [Paper Presentation]. International Studies Association Conference 2005, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. (1998). Fitness interdependence theory. A paper presented for the comprehensive exam requirement for Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. (1999). The origins of investment: A theory of close relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(11-B), 5830 (UMI No. 9950232).Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., & Brown, R. M. (2006). Selective investment theory: Recasting the functional significance of close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. L., & Brown, R. M. (2015). Connecting prosocial behavior to improved physical health: Contributions from the neurobiology of parenting. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S. L., Brown, R. M., & Preston, S. D. (2012). The human caregiving system: A neuroscience model of compassionate motivation and behavior. In Brown, S. L., Brown, R., & Penner, L. (Eds.), Moving beyond self-interest: Perspectives from evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and the social sciences (pp. 75–88). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cao, J., Kong, D. T., & Galinsky, A. D. (2020). Breaking bread produces bigger pies: An empirical extension of shared eating to negotiations and a commentary on Woolley and Fishbach (2019). Psychological Science, 31, 1340–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, J. S., Ellison, P. T., Evans, J., Lee, P. S., & Lieberman, L. S. (1993). Death, hope, and sex: Life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies. Current Anthropology, 34, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Columbus, S., Molho, C., Righetti, F., & Balliet, D. (2021). Interdependence and cooperation in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120, 626–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jing, Y., Gries, P. H., Li, Y., Stivers, A. W., Mifune, N., Kuhlman, D. M., & Bai, L. (2017). War or peace? How the subjective perception of great power interdependence shapes preemptive defensive aggression. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., & Hastie, R. (2003). The logic of social sharing: An evolutionary game analysis of adaptive norm development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullberg, J. S., & Singer, J. D. (2012). Bringing neuroscience into political science: The caregiving system and human sociopolitical evolution. In Brown, S. L., Brown, R., & Penner, L. (Eds.), Moving beyond self-interest: Perspectives from evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and the social sciences (pp. 246–268). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. (1997). Life history theory and human reproductive behavior. Human Nature, 8, 327–359. doi:10.1007/BF02913038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mecklin, J. (Ed.). (2023). A time of unprecedented danger: It is 90 seconds to midnight. Science and Security Board Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (n.d.). Retrieved April 6, 2023, from http://storage.pardot.com/878782/1674512728rAkm0Vt3/2023_doomsday_clock_statement.pdfGoogle Scholar
Morris, E. (Director) (2003). The fog of war: Eleven lessons from the life of Robert S. McNamara [Film]. Radical Media and SenArt Productions.Google Scholar
Morsky, B., & Akcay, E. (2019). Evolution of social norms and correlated equilibria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 8834–8839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherif, M. (1954). Experimental study of positive and negative intergroup attitudes between experimentally produced groups: Robbers cave study. University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. University Press.Google Scholar
Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2019). Shared plates, shared minds: Consuming from a shared plate promotes cooperation. Psychological Science, 30, 541–552. doi:10.1177/0956797619830633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
The evolution of peace
Related commentaries (30)
A game of raids: Expanding on a game theoretical approach utilising the prisoner's dilemma and ethnography in situ
A neurological foundation for peaceful negotiations
Capacities for peace, and war, are old and related to Homo construction of worlds and communities
Creating shared goals and experiences as a pathway to peace
Cultural technologies for peace may have shaped our social cognition
Economic games for the study of peace
Enhanced cooperation increases the capacity for conflict
Evolution, culture, and the possibility of peace
Experimental evidence suggests intergroup relations are, by default, neutral rather than aggressive
Group-structured cultural selection can explain both war and peace
How language and agriculture promote culture- and peace-promoting norms
Impediments to peace
Is peace a human phenomenon?
Language likely promoted peace before 100,000 ya
On peace and its logic
On the evolved psychological mechanisms that make peace and reconciliation between groups possible
Peace as prerequisite rather than consequence of cooperation
Peace in other primates
Peace is a form of cooperation, and so are the cultural technologies which make peace possible
Police for peace
Rethinking peace from a bonobo perspective
Social and economic interdependence as a basis for peaceful between-group relationships in nonhuman primates and humans
Social norms, mentalising, and common knowledge, in making peace and war
The evolution of (intergroup) peace hinges on how we define groups and peace
The evolution of peace (and war) is driven by an elementary social interaction mechanism
The importance of social rejection as reputational sanction in fostering peace
The intertwined nature of peace and war
The psychology of intergroup relations was grounded in intragroup processes
The role of religion in the evolution of peace
The roots of peace
Author response
Author's response: The challenge of peace