Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:34:03.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cooperation and obligation in early parent-child relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Ross A. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA956160-8686. [email protected]://psychology.ucdavis.edu/people/rathom

Abstract

Tomasello's moral psychology of obligation would be developmentally deepened by greater attention to early experiences of cooperation and shared social agency between parents and infants, evolved to promote infant survival. They provide a foundation for developing understanding of the mutual obligations of close relationships that contribute (alongside peer experiences) to growing collaborative skills, fairness expectations, and fidelity to social norms.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, L. B. & Frick, J. E. (2003) The still face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy 4(4):451–73. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0404_01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1946) Psychology and democracy. The Political Quarterly 17(1):6175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.1946.tb01028.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpendale, J. I. M., Hammond, S. I. & Atwood, S. (2013) Chapter Six – A relational developmental systems approach to moral development. In: Advances in child development and behavior, vol. 44, ed. Lerner, R. M. & Benson, J. B., pp. 125–53. Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-397946-9.00006-3.Google Scholar
Chisholm, J. S. (in press) Attachment and the deep history of culture. In: Attachment: The fundamental questions, ed. Thompson, R. A., Simpson, J. A. & Berlin, L.. Guilford.Google Scholar
Hamlin, J. K. (2013) Moral judgment and action in preverbal infants and toddlers: Evidence for an innate moral core. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22(3):186–93. doi:10.1177/0963721412470687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. (2009) Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G. (2002) Mutually responsive orientation between mothers and their young children: A context for the early development of conscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(6):191–95. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanska, G., Boldt, L. J. & Goffin, K. C. (2019) Early relational experience: A foundation for the unfolding dynamics of parent-child socialization. Child Development Perspectives 13(1):41–7. doi:10.1111/cdep.12308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohlberg, L. (1969) Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In: Handbook of socialization theory and research, ed. Goslin, D., pp. 347480. Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E. (1984) Socialization and developmental change. Child Development 55(2):317–28. doi:10.2307/1129945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, E. K., Thompson, R. A. & Goodman, M. (2016) Individual differences in toddlers’ prosociality: Experiences in early relationships explain variability in prosocial behavior. Child Development 87(6):1715–26. doi:10.1111/cdev.12631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1932) Moral judgment of the child. Free Press. (1965; original work published in 1932).Google Scholar
Thompson, R. A. (2012) Wither the preconventional child? Toward a life-span moral development theory. Child Development Perspectives 6(4):423–29. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00245.x.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. A. (2019) Early moral development and attachment theory. In: The Oxford handbook of parenting and moral development, ed. Laible, D., Padilla-Walker, L. M. & Carlo, G., pp. 2139. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar