Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:07:25.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual implications of kinship terminological systems: Special problems and multiple analytic approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2010

David B. Kronenfeld
David B. Kronenfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521. [email protected]/david-judy/david.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I raise issues concerning Jones' Seneca analysis, its relationship to analyses of Dravidian-, Crow-, and Omaha-type systems. These affect the convincingness of his kinship study, and thus the wider conclusions that he wants to draw regarding human cognition and language.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2010 , pp. 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gould, S. (2000) A new system for the formal analysis of kinship. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F. (1964a) The structural analysis of kinship semantics. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics, ed. Hunt, H. G.. pp. 1073–93. Mouton.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, F. (1964b) The formal analysis of Crow- and Omaha-type kinship terminologies. In: Explorations in cultural anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, ed. Goodenough, W. H., pp. 351–93. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Read, D. (2001a) Formal analysis of kinship terminologies and its relationship to what constitutes kinship. Anthropological Theory 1(2):239–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romney, A. K. (1965) Kalmuk Mongol and the classification of lineal kinship terminologies. In: Formal semantic analysis, ed. Hammel, E. A., pp. 127–41. American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Romney, A. K. & D'Andrade, R. (1964) Cognitive aspects of English kinship. American Anthropologist 67:146–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar