Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:25:26.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond the sensory/functional dichotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2001

George S. Cree
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5C2, [email protected]@julian.uwo.ca www.publish.uwo.ca/~gcree www.sscl.uwo.ca/psychology/cognitive/mcrae/mcrae.html
Ken McRae
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London N6A 5C2, [email protected]@julian.uwo.ca www.publish.uwo.ca/~gcree www.sscl.uwo.ca/psychology/cognitive/mcrae/mcrae.html

Abstract

Most current theories of category-specific semantic deficits appeal to the role of sensory and functional knowledge types in explaining patients' impairments. We discuss why this binary classification is inadequate, point to a more detailed knowledge type taxonomy, and suggest how it may provide insight into the relationships between category-specific semantic deficits and impairments of specific aspects of knowledge.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)