Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rj9fg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T08:43:39.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond our “ancient roots”: Toward a broader understanding of the motivational power of societal meta-narratives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2025

Laura Akers*
Affiliation:
Oregon Research Institute, Springfield, OR, USA [email protected] https://www.ori.org/project/laura-akers/
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

The “historical myths” addressed in the target article are but one type of societal meta-narrative, a cognitive framework for understanding the story of one's group: Its origins, purpose, turning points, threats and opportunities, key relationships, and the appropriate affect for group members. Engagement with the broader literature on meta-narratives, including political and sacred myths, and on group entitativity is recommended.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bottici, C. (2007). A philosophy of political myth. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, C. (1996). Political myth: A theoretical introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Girardet, R. (1986). Mythes et mythologies politiques. Seuil.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. L. (2007). Understanding the complexities of group perception: Broadening the domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 10771101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L. ([1935] 1983). Primitive Mythology (La mythologie primitive). University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maan, A. (2015). Counter-terrorism: Narrative strategies. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Maan, A. (2018). Narrative warfare. Narrative Strategies.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1926). Myth in primitive psychology. Norton.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (2014). Magic, science and religion and other essays. Read Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Nowrasteh, A., & Forrester, A. C. (2019). Immigrants recognize American greatness: Immigrants and their descendants are patriotic and trust America's governing institutions. Cato Institute Immigration Research and Policy Brief No. 10. Retrieved from https://www.cato.org/publications/immigration-research-policy-brief/immigrants-recognize-american-greatness-immigrantsGoogle Scholar
Saucier, G., & Akers, L. G. (2018). Democidal thinking: Patterns in the mindset behind organized mass killing. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 12(1), 8097. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.12.1.1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. (2003). Moral, believing animals: Human personhood and culture. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tismaneanu, V. (1998). Fantasies of salvation: Democracy, nationalism, and myth in post-Communist Europe. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tudor, H. (1972). Political myth. Macmillan International Higher Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. (1917). Address to the United States Sixty-Fifth Congress. Senate Document No. 5. 2 April 1917. Available at: https://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/4943/Google Scholar