Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:04:13.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioral momentum and Pavlovian conditioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2005

Randolph C. Grace  and
John A. Nevin
Randolph C. Grace*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
John A. Nevin*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH03824-3518
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The constructs of behavioral mass in research on the momentum of operant behavior and associative strength in Pavlovian conditioning have some interesting parallels, as suggested by Savastano & Miller. Some recent findings challenge the strict separation of operant and Pavlovian determiners of response rate and resistance to change in behavioral momentum, renewing the need for research on the interaction of processes that have traditionally been studied separately. Relatedly, Furedy notes that some autonomic responses may be refractory to conditioning, but a combination of operant contingencies and enriched Pavlovian stimulus-reinforcer relations may prove effective.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , October 2004 , pp. 695 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Commentary onJohn A. Nevin & Randolph C. Grace (2000). Behavioral momentum and the Law of Effect. BBS 23(1):73–130.

References

Ahearn, W. H., Clark, K. M., Gardner, N. C., Chung, B. I. & Dube, W. V. (2003) Persistence of stereotypic behavior: Examining the effects of external reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 36:439–48. [rRCG]Google Scholar
Annau, Z. & Kamin, L. J. (1961) The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 54:428–32. [HIS]Google Scholar
Capaldi, E. J. (1967) A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 1, ed. Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T., pp. 67–156. Academic Press. [HIS]Google Scholar
Case, D. A. (2000) To augment yet not contradict. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:93–94. [rRCG]Google Scholar
Colwill, R. C. & Rescorla, R. A. (1985) Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 11:120–32. [HIS]Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J. (1987) On some research-community contributions to the myth of biofeedback. International Journal of Psychophysiology 4:293–97. [JJF]Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J. (1992) Reflections on human Pavlovian decelerative heart-rate conditioning with negative tilt as US: Alternative approaches. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 27:347–55. [JJF]Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J., Poulos, C. X. & Schiffmann, K. (1975) Logical problems with Prokasy's assessment of contingency relations in classical skin conductance conditioning. Behavior Research and Instrumentation 7:521–23. [JJF]Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J. & Riley, D. (1987) Human Pavlovian autonomic conditioning and the cognitive paradigm. In: Cognitive processes and Pavlovian conditioning in humans, ed. Davey, G.. Wiley. [JJF]Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J. & Shulhan, D. (1987) Specific versus placebo effects in biofeedback training: A critical lay perspective. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation 12:211–15. [JJF]Google Scholar
Gormezano, I. (1966) Classical conditioning. In: Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology, ed. Sidowski, J. B., pp. 385–420. McGraw-Hill. [HIS]Google Scholar
Grace, R. C., Schwendiman, J. I. & Nevin, J. A. (1998) Effects of delayed reinforcement on preference and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 69:247–61. [rRCG]Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1949) Principles of behavior. Appleton-Century. [JJF]Google Scholar
Kamin, L. J. & Brimer, C. J. (1963) The effects of intensity of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli on a conditioned emotional response. Canadian Journal of Psychology 17:194–98. [HIS]Google Scholar
Maze, J. R. (1983) The meaning of behavior. Allen & Unwin. [JJF]Google Scholar
Miller, N. E. (1969) Learning of visceral and glandular responses. Science 163:434–45. [JJF]Google Scholar
Miller, R. R. & Matzel, L. D. (1988) The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In: The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 22, ed. Bower, G. H., pp. 51–92. Academic Press. [HIS]Google Scholar
Nevin, J. A. (1988) Behavioral momentum and the partial reinforcement effect. Psychological Bulletin 103:44–56. [HIS]Google Scholar
Nevin, J. A. & Grace, R. C. (2000) Behavioral momentum and the Law of Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(1):73–130. [JJF, rRCG, HIS]Google Scholar
Nevin, J. A., Grace, R. C., Holland, S. & McLean, A. P. (2001) Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: Response rate, resistance to change, and preference. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 76:43–74. [rRCG]Google Scholar
Prokasy, W. F. (1965) Classical eyelid conditioning: Experimenter operations, task demands, and response shaping. In: Classical conditioning, ed. Prokasy, W. F.. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [JJF]Google Scholar
Prokasy, W. F. (1975) Random controls: A rejoinder. Behavior Research and Instrumentation 7:524–26. [JJF]Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1967) Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review 74:71–80. [JJF]Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1969) Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin 72:77–94. [JJF]Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. (1988) Pavlovian conditioning: It's not what you think it is. American Psychologist 43:151–60. [JJF]Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. & Wagner, A. R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, ed. Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F., pp. 64–99. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [HIS]Google Scholar
Sheffield, V. F. (1949) Extinction as a function of the distribution of extinction trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39:511–26. [HIS]Google Scholar
Smith, M. C. (1968) CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 66:679–87. [HIS]Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. (1932) Purposive behavior in animals and men. Century. [HIS]Google Scholar
Tota-Faucette, M. E. (1991) Alternative reinforcement and resistance to change. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro. [rRCG]Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R., Siegel, S., Thomas, E. & Ellison, G. D. (1964) Reinforcement history and the extinction of a conditioned salivary response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 58:354–58. [HIS]Google Scholar