Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2017
Pepper & Nettle use an evolutionary framework to argue that “temporal discounting” is an appropriate response to low socioeconomic status (SES), or deprivation. We suggest some conceptual refinements to their “appropriate-response” perspective, with the hope that it usefully informs future research on and public policy responses to the relationship between deprivation and temporal discounting.
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
Target article
The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences
Related commentaries (31)
Beyond personal control: The role of developing self-control abilities in the behavioral constellation of deprivation
Both collection risk and waiting costs give rise to the behavioral constellation of deprivation
Cultural consonance, deprivation, and psychological responses for niche construction
Deprived, but not depraved: Prosocial behavior is an adaptive response to lower socioeconomic status
Developing the behavioural constellation of deprivation: Relationships, emotions, and not quite being in the present
Divergent life histories and other ecological adaptations: Examples of social-class differences in attention, cognition, and attunement to others
Epigenetic-based hormesis and age-dependent altruism: Additions to the behavioural constellation of deprivation
Evolutionary approaches to deprivation transform the ethics of policy making
From perceived control to self-control, the importance of cognitive and emotional resources
Health behaviour, extrinsic risks, and the exceptions to the rule
Intergenerational capital flows are central to fitness dynamics and adaptive evolution in humans
Interpreting risky behavior as a contextually appropriate response: Significance and policy implications beyond socioeconomic status
Intertemporal impulsivity can also arise from persistent failure of long-term plans
It's not just about the future: The present payoffs to behaviour vary in degree and kind between the rich and the poor
Loss of control is not necessary to induce behavioral consequences of deprivation: The case of religious fasting during Ramadan
Predictability or controllability: Which matters more for the BCD?
Public health interventions can increase objective and perceived control by supporting people to enact the choices they want to make
Relative state, social comparison reactions, and the behavioral constellation of deprivation
Socioeconomic status, unpredictability, and different perceptions of the same risk
Stuff goes wrong, so act now
The behavioral constellation of deprivation may be best understood as risk management
The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Compelling framework, messy reality
The elusive constellations of poverty
The link between deprivation and its behavioural constellation is confounded by genetic factors
The physiological constellation of deprivation: Immunological strategies and health outcomes
The uncontrollable nature of early learning experiences
The “appropriate” response to deprivation: Evolutionary and ethical dimensions
Toward a balanced view of stress-adapted cognition
Uncertainty about future payoffs makes impatience rational
What about the behavioral constellation of advantage?
When does deprivation motivate future-oriented thinking? The case of climate change
Author response
Strengths, altered investment, risk management, and other elaborations on the behavioural constellation of deprivation