Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:40:09.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neither Absolutism nor Anarchy: New Narratives on Society and Government in Late Imperial Austria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Gary B. Cohen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A reevaluation by historians of political life in late imperial Austria and the capacity of the state to accommodate modern modes of popular political engagement is long overdue. Over the last twenty years lively discussions have developed about the extent of political modernization in Germany and Russia during the last decades before World War I. A number of historians have argued that modes of government and popular politics changed much more significantly in those empires than was previously recognized. In the meantime an important new monographic literature has arisen on popular political action, government, and civil administration in the Habsburg monarchy that suggests that much the same may have taken place there, too.

Type
Articles
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 37 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On Germany see, for example, Anderson, Margaret L., “Interdenominationalism, Clericalism, Pluralism: The Zentrumsstreit and the Dilemma of Catholicism in Wilhelmine Germany,” Central European History 21 (1988): 350–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “The Kulturkampf and the Course of German History,” Central European History 19 (1986): 82–115;CrossRefGoogle Scholaridem, “Voter, Junker, Landrat, Priest: The Old Authorities and the New Franchise in Imperial Germany,” American Historical Review 98 (1993): 1448–74;Google ScholarDavid, Blackbourn, Class, Religion and Local Politics in Wilhelmine Germany: The Centre Party in Württemberg before 1914 (New Haven, Conn., 1980);Google ScholarDavid, Blackbourn and Geoff, Eley, The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Oxford, 1984);Google Scholar and Geoff, Eley, Reshaping the German Right: Radical Nationalism and Political Change after Bismarck (New Haven, Conn., 1980). On Russia, see, for example,Google ScholarOlga, Crisp and Linda, Edmonson, eds., Civil Rights in Imperial Russia (New York, 1989)Google Scholar; Robert, Edelman, Gentry Politics in Russia on the Eve of the Russian Revolution: The Nationalist Party, 1907–1917 (New Brunswick, N.J., 1980);Google ScholarTerence, Emmons, The Formation of Political Parties and the First National Elections in Russia (Cambridge, Mass., 1983);Google Scholaridem., The Zemstvo in Russia: An Experiment in Local Self-Government (Cambridge, 1982);Google ScholarHaimson, Leopold H., ed. The Politics of Rural Russia, 1905–1914 (Bloomington, Ind., 1979);Google ScholarStockdale, Melissa K., Paul Miliukov and the Quest for a Liberal Russia, 1880–1918 (Ithaca, N.Y., 1996);Google ScholarTheodore, Taranovski and Peggy, Mclnerny, eds., Reform in Modern Russian History: Progress or Cycle? (Washington, D.C., and Cambridge, 1995)Google Scholar; and Weissman, Neil B., Reform in Tsarist Russia: The State Bureaucracy and Local Government, 1900–1914 (New Brunswick, N.J., 1981).Google Scholar

2 See, for example, Solomon, Wank, “Some Reflections on the Habsburg Empire and Its Legacy in the Nationalities Question” Austrian History Yearbook 28 (1997): 131–46;Google Scholar and the collection, The End of Empire? The Transformation of the USSR in Comparative Perspective, ed. Karen, Dawisha and Bruce, Parrott (Armonk, N.Y., and London, 1997), which includes a thoughtful essay on the Habsburg monarchy by Wank, “The Disintegration of the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires,” 94–120.Google Scholar

3 Boyer, John W., Political Radicalism in Late Imperial Vienna: Origins of the Christian Social Movement, 1848–1897 (Chicago, 1981), xiv.Google Scholar

4 Lothar, Hobelt, “Parliamentary Politics in a Multinational Setting: Late Imperial Austria,” Working Paper 92–6, Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota, 1992, p. 6.Google Scholar

5 For examples of the critiques, see Joseph, Schöffel, Der Parlamentarismus. Erne Studie (Vienna, 1902), 22–23;Google ScholarErnst Victor, Zenker, Ein Mann im sterbenden Österreich. Erinnerungen aus meinem Leben (Liberec, 1935), 135–39Google Scholar; and, in a more moderate version, Robert, Ehrhart, Im Dienstedes alten Österreich (Vienna, 1958), 211.Google Scholar

6 Johnston, William M., The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1972)Google Scholar; Schorske, Carl E., Fin-de-Siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture (New York, 1980).Google Scholar

7 On the notion of an Austrian Sonderweg in the historical literature,Google Scholarsee Boyer, John W., “Some Reflections on the Problem of Austria, Germany and Mitteleuropa,” Central European History 22 (1989): 301–16;CrossRefGoogle Scholaridem, Culture and Political Crisis in Vienna: Christian Socialism in Power, 1897–1918 (Chicago, 1995), xii–xiii, 452–60;Google Scholar and Cohen, Gary B., Education and Middle-Class Society in Imperial Austria, 1848–1918 (West Lafayette, Ind., 1996), 1–3, 265–67.Google Scholar On the place of the nationality conflicts in the historiography of the Habsburg monarchy, see Alan, Sked, Historians, the Nationality Question, and the Downfall of the Habsburg Empire (London, 1981).Google Scholar

8 Taylor, A. J. P., The Habsburg Monarchy, 1809–1918 (London, 1948; reprint, Chicago, 1976), 213.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., 170.

10 Arthur, J. May, The Hapsburg Monarchy, 1867–1914 (Cambridge, Mass., 1951; reprint, New York, 1968), 330, 434.Google Scholar

11 Macartney, Carlisle A., The Habsburg Empire, 1790–1918 (London, 1969);Google ScholarKann, Robert A., A History of the Habsburg Empire, 1526–1918 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1974).Google ScholarThe French historian Victor Lucien Tapié in his Monarchie et peuples du Danube (Paris, 1969),Google Scholar published in English as The Rise and Fall of the Habsburg Monarchy, trans. Stephen, Hardman (New York, 1971),Google Scholar treated the development of government and politics more superficially, although he was more openly sympathetic to the Slavic peoples in the realm, particularly the Czechs, than were Macartney and Kann.

12 Macartney, , Habsburg Empire, 604 (quotation), 614, 668–69 (quotation), 796.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 553.

14 Kann, , History of the Habsburg Empire, 424.Google Scholar

15 Barbara, Jelavich, Modern Austria: Empire and Republic, 1815–1986 (Cambridge, 1987).Google Scholar

16 Erich, Zöllner, Geschichte Österreichs, 8th ed. (Vienna, 1990), 427–42.Google Scholar

17 Kann, Robert A.,“Zur Problematik der Nationalitätenfrage in der Habsburgermonarchie 1848–1918. Eine Zusammenfassung,” in Die Habsburgermonarchie 1848–1918, ed.Adam, Wandruszka and Pete, Urbanitsch, vol. 3: Die Völker des Reiches, 2 parts (Vienna, 1980), pt. 2,1304–38.Google Scholar

18 Alan, Sked, The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire, 1815–1918 (London, 1989).Google Scholar

19 On Galicia in general, see Markovits, Andrei S. and Sysyn, Frank E., eds., Nationbuilding and the Politics of Nationalism: Essays on Austrian Galicia (Cambridge, Mass., 1982)Google Scholar; and the essays by Henryk, Batowski on the Poles and Wolfdieter Bihl on the Ukrainians (Ruthenians) in Die Völker des Reiches, ed. Wandruszka and Urbanitsch, pt. 1, 522–84. On Hungary, see George, Barany, “Ungarns Verwaltung: 1848–1918,” in Die Habsburgermonarchie 1848–1918,Google Scholar ed. Adam, Wandruszka and Peter, Urbanitsch, vol. 1: Verwaltung und Rechtswesen (Vienna, 1975), 306–468Google Scholar; and the overviews in Macartney, , Habsburg Empire, 687–721; May, Hapsburg Monarchy, 70–89, 227–69;Google Scholar and Ervin, Pamlényi, ed., Die Geschichte Ungarns (Budapest, 1971), 399–79, passim.Google Scholar

20 Boyer, John W., “Freud, Marriage, and Late Viennese Liberalism: A Commentary from 1905,” Journal of Modern History 50 (1978): 73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

21 Ernst, Hanisch, Österreichische Geschichte 1890–1990. Der lange Schatten des Staates. Österreichische Gesellschaftsgeschichte im zwanzigsten Jahrhundert (Vienna, 1994), 28–29, 209–10.Google Scholar (quotations). For critical responses to Hanisch, , see the roundtable discussion “Der lange Schatten der Historiographie oder barocke Aurklärung,” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 6 (1995): 85–118Google Scholar; and Dieter, Groh and Martin, Zürn, “Der Lange Schatten der ‘Gesellschaftsgeschichte,’”Google Scholaribid., 569–6. Hanisch replied to the roundtable in “Anklagesache. Österreichische Gesellschaftsgeschichte,” ibid., 457–65.

22 Garver, Bruce M., The Young Czech Party, 1874–1901, and the Emergence of a Multi-Party System (New Haven, Conn., 1978);Google ScholarBoyer, , Political Radicalism;Google ScholarCohen, Gary B., The Politics of Ethnic Survival: Germans in Prague, 1861–1914 (Princeton, N.J., 1981).Google Scholar

23 On Galicia, see the essays by Rudnytsky, Ivan L., Piotr, Wandycz, and John-Paul, Himka in Nationbuilding and the Politics of Nationalism, ed. Markovits and Sysyn, 23–93, 178–95;Google ScholarHimka, J.-P., Galician Villagers and the Ukrainian National Movement in the Nineteenth Century (New York, 1988);CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Keely, Stauter-Halsted, “From Serf to Citizen: Peasant Political Organizations in Galician Poland, 1848–1895” (Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan, 1993).Google Scholar On the Hungarian lands, see Zoltán, Bodrogkozy, A magyar agrármozgalmaktörténete (A history of agrarian movements in Hungary) (Budapest, 1929);Google ScholarFriedrich, Gottas, Ungarn im Zeitalter des Hochliberalismus. Studien zur Tisza-Ära (Vienna, 1976);Google ScholarZoltán, Horvath, Die Jahrhundertwende in Ungarn. Die Geschichte der zweiten Reformgeneration 1896–1914 (Budapest, 1966);Google ScholarJanos, Andrew C., The Politics of Backwardness in Hungary, 1825–1945 (Princeton, N.J., 1982);Google ScholarJudit, Kubinszky, Politikai antiszemitizmus Magyarországon,1875–1890 (Political anti-Semitism in Hungary, 1875–1890) (Budapest, 1976);Google ScholarErnö, Lakatos, A magyar politikai vezetöréteg, 1848–1918 (The Hungarian political elite, 1848–1918) (Budapest, 1942);Google ScholarGyula, Mérei, A magyar polgári pártok programjai 1867–1918 (The programs of the Hungarian middle-class parties, 1867–1918) (Budapest, 1971);Google ScholarMiklós, Szabó, “Új vonások a szá;zadfordulói magyar konzervativ politikai gondolkodàsban” (New trends in Hungarian conservative thought at the turn of the century), Századok 108 (1974): 3–65;Google Scholar and Adalbert, Toth, Parteien und Reichstagswahlen in Ungarn 1848–1892 (Munich, 1973).Google Scholar

24 See Cohen, , Education and Middle-Class Society, chaps. 1 and 3.Google Scholar

25 See, for various instances, Erich Graf von, Kielmansegg, Kaiserhaus, Staatsmänner und Politiker (Vienna, 1966), 8–9, 31–33, 40–42, 45–47, 55, 62–63, 70.Google Scholar

26 Jean-Paul, Bled, Francois-Joseph (Paris, 1987),Google Scholar published in English as Franz Joseph, trans. Bridgeman, T. (Oxford, 1992);Google ScholarPalmer, Alan W., Twilight of the Habsburgs: The Life and Times of Emperor Francis Joseph (London, 1994).Google Scholar The briefer, more popular treatment in Steven, Beller, Francis Joseph (London, 1996)Google Scholar presses determinedly the thesis that the emperor, through his own narrowness and obstinacy in defense of his prerogatives, contributed significantly to the dysfunctions of the monarchy's political system, its ultimately disastrous foreign policy, and indirectly many of the tribulations of the successor states in the interwar period.

27 See Boyer, John W., “Religion and Political Development in Central Europe around 1900: A View from Vienna,” Austrian History Yearbook 25 (1994): 32–34;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Theo, Ölinger, “Zur Entstehung, Begründung und zu Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten des österreichischen Föderalismus,” in Aus Österreichs Rechtsleben in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Festschrift fürGoogle ScholarErnst, C.Hellbling zum80.Geburtstag (Berlin, 1981), 314–15.Google Scholar

28 See Boyer, , Political Radicalism;Google Scholaridem, Culture and Political Crisis; Cohen, , Politics of Ethnic Survival; Garver, , Young Czech Party;Google ScholarPeter, Heumos, Agrarische Interessen und Nationale Politik in Böhmen 1848–1889 (Wiesbaden, 1979);Google ScholarLothar, Höbelt, Kornblume und Kaiseradler. Die deutschfreiheitlichen Parteien Altösterreichs 1882–1918 (Vienna and Munich, 1993);Google ScholarHubbard, William H., Aufdem Weg zur Groβstadt. Erne Sozialgeschichte der Stadt Graz 1850–1914 (Vienna, 1984);Google Scholaridem, “Social Mobility and Social Structure in Graz, 1857–1910,” journal of Social History 17 (1984): 453–62;CrossRefGoogle ScholarJudson, Pieter M., Exclusive Revolutionaries: Liberal Politics, Social Experience, and National Identity in the Austrian Empire, 1848–1914 (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1996);Google Scholaridem, “ German Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Austria: Clubs, Parties, and the Rise of Bourgeois Politics”; (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1987);Google Scholaridem, ‘“Not Another Square Foot!’German Liberalism and the Rhetoric of National Ownership in Nineteenth-Century Austria,” Austrian History Yearbook 26 (1995): 83–98;CrossRefGoogle ScholarJiří, Malíř, Od spolků k moderním politickym stranám. Vývoj politických stran na Moravě v letech 1848–1914 (From voluntary associations to modern political parties: The development of political parties in Moravia, 1848–1914), Spisy Masarykovy Univerzity v Brně, Filozofická fakulta (Publications of the Masaryk University, Brno), no. 307 (Brno, 1996);Google Scholaridem, “Pokrokové hnutí na Moravě” (The progressive movement in Moravia), Sborník prací filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity (Collection of studies from the Philosophical Faculty of the Brno University) 23–24, no. 21–22 (1975–1976): 101–122; 27–28, no. 25–26 (1978–79): 99–129;Google Scholaridem, Vývoj liberálnfho proudu české politiky na Moravě. Lidová strana na Morave do roku 1909 (The development of the liberal current in Czech politics in Moravia. The People's Party in Moravia to 1909),Google Scholar Spisy Univerzity Purkyněv Brně, J. E., Filozofická, Fakulta (Publications of the J. E. Purkyně University in Brno, Philosophical Faculty) no. 258 (Brno, 1985);Google Scholar and Tomáš, Vojtech, Mladočeši a boj o politickou mocv Čechách (The Young Czechs and the struggle for political power in Bohemia) (Prague, 1980).Google Scholar

29 See Norman, Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland, 2 vols. (New York, 1984), 2:139–62, 240–58, passim;Google ScholarEverett, Leila P., “The Rise of Jewish National Politics in Galicia, 1905–1907,” in Nationbuilding and the Politics of Nationalism, ed. Markovits and Sysyn, 149–77;Google ScholarStanislaw, Kozicki, Historia Ligi Narodowej (History of the National League) (London, 1964);Google ScholarEzra, Mendelsohn, “Jewish Assimilation in Ľviv: The Case of Wilhelm Friedman,” Slavic Review 28 (1969):577–90;Google ScholarOlga, Narkiewicz, The Green Flag: Polish Populist Politics, 1867–1970 (London, 1976);Google ScholarPorter, Brian A., “Who Is a Pole and Where Is Poland? Territory and Nation in the Rhetoric of Polish National Democracy before 1905,” Slavic Review 51 (1992): 639–53;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Piotr, Wandycz, The Lands of Partitioned Poland, 1795–1918 (Seattle, Wash., 1974), 288–95Google Scholar

30 On the politics of the Polish peasantry, see Krzystof, Dunińi-Wasowicz, Dzieje Stronnictwa Ludowego w Galicji (The history of the peasant movement in Galicia) (Warsaw, 1956);Google ScholarStefan, Inglot, ed., Historia Chtopów Polskich (A History of the Polish Peasants), 3 vols. (Warsaw, 1972);Google ScholarNarkiewicz, , The Green Flag; Stauter-Halsted, “From Serf to Citizen”;Google Scholar and Idem, “Patriotic Celebrations in Austrian Poland: The Kosciuszko Centennial and the Formation of Peasant Nationalism,” Austrian History Yearbook 25 (1994): 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 See Judson, , Exclusive RevolutionariesGoogle Scholar, passim; Idem, “ ‘Not Another Square Foot!’”; and Höbelt, Kornblume und Kaiseradler, passim.

32 On politics in Linz and Upper Austria, see Else, Beurle, Dr. Carl Beurle 1860–1919. Ein Lebensbild (Linz, 1960);Google Scholar on Prague municipal politics, Giustino, Cathleen M., “Architects and the Task of Urban Planning in Late Imperial Czech Prague, 1866–1900: Winning Jurisdiction ‘;from Below,’” in Professionen im modernen Osteuropa/Professions in Modern Eastern Europe, ed. Charles, McClelland, Stephen, Merl, AND Hannes, Siegrist (Berlin, 1995), 464–91;Google Scholaridem, “Parteien, Politik, Demokratie und der Prager Kompromipß von 1896,” in Wien—Prag—Budapest. Urbanisierung, Kommunalpolitik, gesellschaftliche Konflikte 1867–1918, ed. Gerhard, Melinz and Susan, Zimmermann (Vienna, 1995), 123–39;Google Scholar and idem, “Architecture and the Nation: Meanings of Modern Urban Design and Possibilities for Political Participation in Czech Prague 1900” (Ph.D. diss.,University of Chicago, 1997);Google Scholar and on Moravia, see Malíř, , “Pokrokově hnutí na Moravě”Google Scholar and idem, Vývoj liberálního proudu.Google Scholar

33 See, for examples, Kielmansegg, , Kaiserhaus, 8–9, 205–6; and Enquête der Kommission zurFörderung der Verwaltungsreform veranstaltet in der Zeit vom 21. Oktober bis 9. November 1912 (Vienna, 1913), 5–6,161.Google Scholar On provincial and local government in the Austrian lands in the late nineteenth century, see Hellbling, Ernst C., “Die Landesverwaltung in Cisleithanien,”Google Scholar and Jiří, Klabouch, “Die Lokalverwaltung in Cisleithanien,” in Die Habsburgermonarchie 1848–1918, ed. Adam, Wandruszka and Peter, Urbanitsch, vol. 2:Verwaltung und Rechtswesen (Vienna, 1975), 190–269,270–305.Google Scholar

34 See Jan, Galandauer, “Husův národ a most Františka Ferdinanda” (The nation of Hus and the Francis Ferdinand Bridge), Historie a vojenství 44 (1995): 3–20.Google Scholar

35 Kielmansegg, , Kaiserhaus, 74–76.Google Scholar

36 On the organization and development of the representative institutions and administrative mechanisms of the Austrian crown lands, see Ludwig, Spiegel, “Länder. Autonomie und Selbstverwaltung in der Gegenwart,” in Österreichisches Staatswörterbuch, ed. Ernst, Mischler and Josef, Ulbrich, 2nd rev. ed., 4 vols. (Vienna, 1905–1909), 3:395–430;Google Scholar and Hellbling, , “Die Landesverwaltung,” 190–269.Google Scholar

37 On the responsibilities of the provincial diets, see Boyer, , “Religion and Political Development,” 31–36; and from a Czech nationalist perspective,Google ScholarBohumil, Baxa, Sněm království českěho;(The Diet of the Kingdom of Bohemia) (Prague, 1914), 5–7.Google Scholar On the work of the provincial committees, see the memoirs of a longtime member of the Bohemian provincial bureaucracy, Antonín, KláŠterský, Vzpomínky a portrety (Recollections and portraits) (Prague, 1934), particularly 142–78;Google Scholar and those of a veteran mayor and diet member in Lower Austria, Joseph, Schöffel,Erinnerungen aus meinem Leben (Vienna, 1905), 241–334, passim.Google Scholar

38 On the Annapatente,Google Scholarsee Jörg, Hoensch, Geschichte Böhmens von der slavischen Landnahme bis ins 20. Jahrhundert (Munich, 1987), 405;Google ScholarGalandauer, , “Husiiv narod,” 5;Google ScholarOtto, Urban, Česká společnost 1848–1918 (Czech society, 1848–1918) (Prague, 1982), 550–51;Google Scholar and the posthumously published work of Karel, Kazbunda, Otázka česko-německá v předvečer velké války (The Czech-German question on the eve of the Great War), ed. Zdeněk, Kárník (Prague, 1995).Google Scholar

40 See Klášterský, , Vzpomínky a portrety, 172–74.Google Scholar

41 Höbelt, , “Parliamentary Politics,” 13;Google Scholaridem,Kornblume und Kaiseradler, 288–90.

42 On the tactics used by Austrian minister-presidents for dealing with individual deputies and factions in the Reichsrat, see Ehrhart, , Im Dienste, 132–38, 144–45, 175–85; and Kielmansegg, ,Kaiserhaus, 44–45, 51–52, 56–57, 263, 356, 410–11, passim.Google Scholar

42 Hanisch, , Österreichische Geschichte 1890–1990, 232.Google Scholar

43 On Stürgkh, see Boyer, , Culture and Political Crisis, 288–97.Google Scholar

44 Ehrhart, , Im Dienste, 167–68, 302–13.Google Scholar

45 Ibid. 144–45.

46 Hanisch, , Österreichische Geschichte 1890–1990, 230–31; Höbelt, , Kornblume und Kaiseradler, 180–99, 248–90, 305–14.Google Scholar

47 Höbelt, , “Parliamentary Politics,” 4–6, 12–13.Google Scholar

48 Ibid., 4, 7–13; Kornblume und Kaisemdler, 180–87. See also Judson, , Exclusive Revolutionaries 264–65.Google Scholar

49 On the conflicts between the clerical and anticlerical forces over primary education, see Boyer, , “Religion and Political Development,” 13–58;Google ScholarIdem, Culture and Political Crisis, 164–235, passim;Google Scholar and Helmut, Engelbrecht, Geschichte des österreichischen Bildungsivesens, 5 vols. (Vienna, 1982–1988), 4:79–82,125–34, 247–49.Google Scholar On the public debates over Austrian secondary and higher education at the turn of the century, see Engelbrecht, , Geschichte des österreichischen Bildungswesens, 4:170–89, 232–34; and Cohen, , Education and Middle-Class Society,95–216.Google Scholar

50 Cohen, , Education and Middle-Class Society, 108–26.Google Scholar

51 Barany, , “Ungarns Verwaltung,” 428–31.Google Scholar

52 Höbelt, , “Parliamentary Politics,” 13.Google Scholar

53 Boyer, , Culture and Political Crisis, xii.Google Scholar

54 Eley, , Reshaping the German Right, 1–14, 349–61;Google Scholarsee Blackbourn, and Eley, , The Peculiarities of German History, passim, for the general statement of their argument.Google Scholar

55 See, for example, the critical review of Eley's, Reshaping the German Right by Heinrich August Winkler in Journal of Modern History 54 (1982): 170–76;Google ScholarHans-Ulrich, Wehler, ‘“Deutscher Sonderweg’oder allgemeine Probleme des westlichen Kapitalismus?” Merkur 35 (1981): 478–97;Google Scholar the subsequent debate in Merkur; and Wehler, H.-U., “Wie bürgerlich war das deutsche Kaiserreich?” in Bürger und Burgerlichkeit im 19. Jahrhundert, ed. Jürgen, Kocka (Gottingen, 1987), 243–80.Google Scholar On the recent historiography of modern Germany more broadly, see Jane, Caplan, “Myths, Models, and Missing Revolutions: Comments on a Debate in German History,” Radical History Review 34 (1986): 87–99;Google ScholarMichael, Geyer, “Looking Back at the International Style: Some Reflections on the Current State of German History,” German Studies Review 13 (1990): 112–27;Google ScholarJarausch, Konrad H., “Illiberalism and Beyond: German History in Search of a Paradigm,” Journal of Modern History 55 (1983): 268–84;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Jonathan, Sperber, “Master Narratives of Nineteenth-Century German History,” Central European History 24 (1991): 69–91.Google Scholar