Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 March 2020
This article examines Austrian perceptions of the people and landscape of Bosnia-Herzegovina from 1878 to 1908. It traces Austrians’ fantasies about and encounters with Bosnian Muslims, whom they often categorized as “Turks.” Following the Congress of Berlin, Austrians claimed to be doing the civilizing work of “Europe” in Bosnia. The article investigates the meanings of border and borderlands between the Habsburg Empire and Ottoman Bosnia, focusing in particular on crossings of the Sava River. Drawing on the writings of soldiers, administrators, journalists and travel writers, the essay considers a number of mental maps, imagined geographies of what Habsburg authors thought they knew about the land and people they occupied. It contributes to a growing scholarship on the Habsburg-Ottoman borderlands.
The author wishes to thank heartily Emily Greble and an anonymous reviewer for the AHY for their generous and insightful comments on an earlier version of this article.
2 For concision I refer to Bosnia-Herzegovina throughout the chapter as Bosnia, except when quoting directly from other sources.
3 The population in the late 1870s was roughly 42 percent Orthodox, 38 percent Muslim, and 18 percent Catholic. Sugar, Peter F., Industrialization of Bosnia-Hercegovina, 1878–1918 (Seattle, 1963), 6Google Scholar. Another way of counting the population was by village: in 1878 there were 1,412 Orthodox villages, 793 Muslim villages, and 493 Catholic villages, with a “slightly higher number of mixed settlements.” Okey, Robin, Taming Balkan Nationalism (Oxford, 2007), 2–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 O'Kelly, Franz Mac-Nevin, Vor fünfundzwanzig Jahren. Eigene Erinnerungen aus der Okkupations-Kampagne, 1878, in Bosnien (Graz, 1903), 21Google Scholar. He crossed at Alt-Gradiska.
5 Ibid., 21.
6 Ibid., 22. Here puts “weiße Krain” in quotation marks.
7 Andre Gingrich writes that the “frontier oriental” was (and is) useful in Austria for self-definition. “Frontier Myths of Orientalism: The Muslim World in Public and Popular Cultures of Central Europe,” in MESS. Mediterranean Ethnological Summer School, vol. 2, eds. Baskar, Bojan and Brumen, Borut (Ljubljana, 1996), 99–127, here 111Google Scholar. See also Robert J. Donia, “The Proximate Colony: Bosnia-Herzegovina under Austro-Hungarian Rule,” Kakanien Revisited (11 Sept. 2007), accessed 30 June 2019, www.kakanien.ac.at/beitr/fallstudie/RDonia1.pdf.
8 Haslinger, Peter, ed., Grenze im Kopf. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Grenze in Ostmitteleuropa (Frankfurt, 1999)Google Scholar.
9 Hoernes, Moriz, Bosnien und die Hercegowina (Vienna, 1889), 6Google Scholar. On myths of Bosnia as a “bulwark and firm boundary of Islam” or an “Islamic antemurale against the West” from eighteenth-century Bosnian Muslim chroniclers, see Džaja, Srećko M., “Bosnian Historical Reality and Its Reflection in Myth,” in Myths and Boundaries in South-Eastern Europe, ed. Kolstø, Pål (London, 2005), 106–29, here 113Google Scholar.
10 See Amzi-Erdogdular, Leyla, “Alternative Muslim Modernities: Bosnian Intellectuals in the Ottoman and Habsburg Empires,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 59, no. 4 (2017): 912–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hajdarpasic, Edin, Whose Bosnia? Nationalism and Political Imagination in the Balkans, 1840–1914 (Ithaca, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pinson, Mark, ed., The Muslims of Bosnia-Herzegovina: Their Historic Development from the Middle Ages to the Dissolution of Yugoslavia, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, 1996)Google Scholar; Okey, Taming Balkan Nationalism; Haselsteiner, Horst, Bosnien-Hercegovina. Orientkrise und Südslavische Frage (Vienna, 1996)Google Scholar; Donia, Robert, Islam under the Double Eagle: The Muslims of Bosnia-Herzegovina, 1878–1914 (Boulder, 1981)Google Scholar; Karpat, Kemal H., “The Ottoman Attitude towards the Resistance of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the Austrian Occupation in 1878,” Naučni Skup. Otpor austrougarskoj okupaciji 1878. Godine u Bosni I Hercegovini, Sarajevo, 23. i 24. Oktobra 1978 [Scientific Conference. Resistance to the Austro-Hungarian Occupation of 1878 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo, 23 and 24 Oct. 1978] (Sarajevo, 1979), 147–72Google Scholar.
11 Vushko, Iryna, The Politics of Cultural Retreat: Imperial Bureaucracy in Austrian Galicia, 1772–1867 (New Haven, 2015), 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar. When Vushko writes, “Galicia on the Russian-Austrian frontier never posed dangers similar to those of the Austrian-Ottoman borderland,” 52, she is referring to events that preceded the partitions of Poland. The Habsburgs’ commitment to civilian rather than military administration in Galicia finds rather close parallel in their later approach in Bosnia. On Habsburg Trieste and its shifting “borderland identity” before and after 1918, see Hametz, Maura E., “On the Periphery/At the Frontier: The Triestines in the Northeastern Borderland,” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 5, no. 3 (2000): 277–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Cited in Wolff, Larry, The Idea of Galicia: History and Fantasy in Habsburg Political Culture (Stanford, 2010), 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Ibid., 7.
14 Several excellent recent edited volumes explore these topics at length. See Ruthner, Clemens and Scheer, Tamara, eds., Bosnien-Herzegowina und Österreich-Ungarn: Annäherungen an eine Kolonie (Tübingen, 2018)Google Scholar; Ruthner, Clemens, Reynolds-Cordileone, Diana, Reber, Ursula, and Detrez, Raymond, eds., Wechselwirkungen: Austria-Hungary, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the Western Balkans, 1878–1918 (New York, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Feichtinger, Johannes, Prutsch, Ursula, and Csáky, Moritz, eds. Habsburg Postcolonial. Machtstrukturen und kollektives Gedächtnis (Innsbruck, 2003)Google Scholar; Müller-Funk, Wolfgang, Plener, Peter, and Ruthner, Clemens, eds., Kakanien Revisited. Das Fremde und das Eigene (in) der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie (Tübingen, 2002)Google Scholar.
15 Cited in Wolff, The Idea of Galicia, 16.
16 Sugar, The Industrialization of Bosnia-Hercegovina, 29.
17 Amzi-Erdogdular, “Alternative Muslim Modernities,” 916.
18 See Medlicott, W. N., The Congress of Berlin and After: A Diplomatic History of the Near Eastern Settlement, 1878–1880, 2nd ed. (Hamden, 1963)Google Scholar.
19 Article XXV of the 1878 Treaty of Berlin stated, “The provinces of Bosnia and Herzegovina shall be occupied and administered by Austria-Hungary.” Internet Modern History Sourcebook, accessed 8 Dec. 2018, http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1878berlin.html.
20 Fournier, August, Wie wir zu Bosnien kamen (Vienna, 1909), 82Google Scholar.
21 Die Occupation Bosniens und der Hercegovina durch k.k. Truppen im Jahre 1878, Dargestellt in der Abtheilung für Kriegsgeschichte des k.k. Kriegs-Archivs (Vienna, 1879), 39–40Google Scholar.
22 Ibid., 39: “bei der Regelung der Dinge in Bosnien.”
23 Strausz, Adolf, Bosnien. Land und Leute. Historisch-ethnographische-geographische Schilderung, vol. 2 (Vienna, 1884), iii–ivGoogle Scholar.
24 Die Occupation Bosniens und der Hercegovina durch k.k. Truppen im Jahre 1878, 905. In this case, the fire of violence and “wildness” in the Ottoman province.
25 See Diana Reynolds, “Kavaliere, Kostüme, Kunstgewerbe: Die Vorstellung Bosniens in Wien 1878–1900,” in Habsburg Postcolonial, eds. Feichtinger et al., 243–55, here 244. Reynolds reviews the 1893 ballet “Eine Hochzeit in Bosnien.”
26 [Béni v. Kállay], Die Lage der Mohammedaner in Bosnien von einem Ungarn (Vienna, 1900), 44Google Scholar. Published anonymously, this important text is usually attributed to Kállay. Robin Okey suggests the author may have been Thallóczy., Lajos “A Trio of Hungarian Balkanists: Béni Kállay, István Burián and Lajos Thallóczy in the Age of High Nationalism,” Slavonic and East European Review 80, no. 2 (Apr. 2002): 234–66, here 246Google Scholar.
27 Interestingly, there was a concrete diplomatic “entry” into Europe for the Ottoman Empire in the 1856 Treaty of Paris. It “was officially recognized as a permanent part of the European balance of power.” The preamble stated that “the independence and integrity of the Ottoman Empire was vital to ‘the Peace of Europe,’ and Article 2 gave the Sublime Porte . . . the right ‘a participer aux avantages du droit public et du concert europeen [to take part in the benefits of international law and the Concert of Europe].’” Neumann, Iver B., Uses of the Other: The East in European Identity Formation (Minneapolis, 1998), 40Google Scholar. ProQuest Ebook.
28 See Manasek, Jared, “Protection, Repatriation and Categorization: Refugees and Empire at the End of the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Refugee Studies 30, no. 2 (2017): 301–17Google Scholar.
29 “Memorandum der Insurgenten,” Das Vaterland, 27 Sept. 1875, p. 1–2. See also Koetschet, Josef, Aus Bosniens letzter Türkenzeit. Hinterlassene Aufzeichnungen (Vienna, 1905), 8–10Google Scholar.
30 Noir, Franz, Die Oesterreicher in Bosnien: Erlebnisse eines österreichischen Infanteristen in Bosnien und in der Hercegowina (Prague, 1884), 52Google Scholar.
31 Historian Dragan Damjanović writes, “Despite the proximity of the Ottoman Empire, Islamic architecture had no influence on the design of Military Frontier towns…. Almost all mosques and public buildings constructed in the region during the Ottoman period, before the Habsburg monarchy's expansion, had been demolished. … The mosques were likely taken down as part of an effort to eradicate the region's former Ottoman history—damnatio memoriae—and because there were no longer any Muslims living there.” Damjanović, “Building the Frontier of the Habsburg Empire: Viennese Authorities and the Architecture of Croatian-Slavonian Military Frontier Towns, 1780–1881,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 78, no. 2 (June 2019), 187–207, here 191Google Scholar.
32 Holtz, Georg Frh. v., Von Brod bis Sarajevo (Vienna, 1907), 15–16Google Scholar.
33 Ibid., 14.
34 Schweiger-Lerchenfeld, Amand, Bosnien: das Land und seine Bewohner (Vienna, 1878), 193–94Google Scholar.
35 “Muselmanen” and “Mohammedaner,” Róskiewicz, Johann, Studien über Bosnien und die Herzegovina (Leipzig, 1868), 226, 235Google Scholar; “Bosnische Türken,” Karl Sax, “Skizzen über die Bewohner Bosniens,” Mitteilungen der Kaiserlich-königlichen Geographischen Gesellschaft 7 (1863), 93–107, here 101Google Scholar; “vertürkten Serben,” von Helfert, Joseph Alexander Freiherr, Bosniches, 2nd ed. (Vienna, 1879), 96Google Scholar; “die mohammedanischen Bosnier,” Schweiger-Lerchenfeld, Bosnien, 97; “entarteter mohammedanisirte Serben,” Die Christen in Bosnien, 1853, p. 4. See also Nikola Ornig, “Diversität und Anerkennung. Die Rezeption der muslimischen Bevölkerung Österreich-Ungarns in ethnografischen Werken,” Kakanien Revisited (2004), accessed 30 June 2019, http://www.kakanien.ac.at/beitr/fallstudie/nornig1.pdf.
36 Braum, Carl, Sarajevo 1878 (Leipzig, 1907), 22Google Scholar.
37 Anonynous, Die Christen in Bosnien. Ein Beitrag zur näheren Kenntniß der Verhältnisse der bosnischen Raaja zu den Türken (Vienna, 1853), 3Google Scholar.
38 Helfert, offering a three-hundred-page book on all things Bosnian, nevertheless admits he had never been there. “Traveler! I was not there, and I bet a hundred to one that the gentle reader [has not been] either,” p. 4.
39 The spelling “Brood” also appears in German primary sources.
40 Contemporary German sources did not adhere to standardized spellings of the river towns; for example, press reports referred to Samac or Schamatz, Brcka or Bereschka, etc. Use of the diacritical marks was also not standardized.
41 McClintock, Anne, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest (New York, 1995), 40Google Scholar.
42 Strausz, Bosnien. Land und Leute, iii–iv.
43 Renner, Heinrich, Durch Bosnien und die Hercegovina, kreuz und quer, 2nd ed. (Berlin, 1897), viGoogle Scholar.
44 This was Kállay's claim. Die Lage der Mohammedaner, 3.
45 Evans, Arthur J., Through Bosnia and the Herzegovina on Foot during the Insurrection, August and September 1875, 2nd ed. (London, 1877), 86–89Google Scholar.
46 Renner, Durch Bosnien und die Hercegovina, 1.
47 Michel, Robert, “Notizen von der Korpsschulreise 1910,” in Fahrten in den Reichslanden. Bilder und Skizzen aus Bosnien und der Hercegovina. Mit 25 Zeichnungen von Max Bucherer (Vienna, 1912), 115–16Google Scholar.
48 Rothenberg, Gunther E., The Military Border in Croatia, 1740–1881: A Study of an Imperial Institution (Chicago, 1966), 185Google Scholar. Kaser, Karl, Freier Bauer und Soldat. Die Militarisierung der agrarischen Gesellschaft an der kroatisch–slawonischen Militärgrenze, 1535–1881 (Vienna, 1997), 630–42Google Scholar.
49 Spaleny, Norbert, “Wahrnehmungen und Erfahrungen der k.k. Truppen bei der Occupation Bosniens und der Hercegovina im Jahre 1878,” in Organ der militärwissenschaftlichen Vereine XXIV (Vienna, 1882), 14Google Scholar.
50 One outlier on this question was B. Panković, a native of the Militärgrenze, a self-described “son of the land,” who served as a Habsburg consular official. He predicted that the waning Turkish threat was temporary. Dismantling the Militärgrenze, leaving “large numbers of Turks” living next to “our open borders,” would lead to future “catastrophes.” Panković, B., Die Militärgrenzfrage in ihrer Beziehung zur orientalischen Frage (Vienna, 1865), 3, 19Google Scholar.
51 Rothenberg, The Military Border in Croatia, 186–87.
52 Damjanović, “Building the Frontier of the Habsburg Empire,” 187.
53 Neue Militär-Zeitung 26, no. 41 (21 May 1873), p. 1Google Scholar.
54 Ratzel, Friedrich, Politische Geographie, 3rd ed. (Munich, 1923), 384CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
55 Knoblauch, Joseph Andreas, Die Annexion von Bosnien vom volks- und landwirthschaftlichen Standpunkte (Vienna, 1878), 3Google Scholar. With added commentary, Knoblauch's book was a reproduction of “Die Regulierung des Saveflusses, dann die Ent- und Bewässerung des Savethales in Croatien und Slavonien, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des croatisch-slavonischen Grenzgebietes.” Anordnung des k.k. Generalcommando in Agram als Landesverwaltungsbehörde der croatisch-slavonischen Militärgrenze (Agram, 1876)Google Scholar.
56 Knoblauch, Die Annexion, 5.
57 Ibid., 3, 5, 8–9.
58 On earlier, unsuccessful attempts to work with the Ottoman government on river oversight, see Maier, Lothar, “Die Grenze zwischen dem Habsburgerreich und Bosnien um 1830. Von einem Versuch, eine friedlose Region zu befriedigen,” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 51, no. 3 (2003): 379–91Google Scholar.
59 Knoblauch, Annexion, 12, 17.
60 Ibid., 22.
61 von Radics, Peter, Das befreite Bosnien. Prinz Eugen, 1697—Laudon, 1788—Philippovic, 1878 (Wien, 1879), 106Google Scholar.
62 Neue Freie Presse, 7 Aug. 1878, p. 3.
63 Pilsner Abendpost, 9 Sept. 1878, p. 1.
64 Das Vaterland, 14 Aug. 1878, p. 2.
65 Prager Tagblatt, 20 Aug. 1878, pp. 1–2 [transl: “eingenommen und behauptet werden”].
66 Die Vedette, 14 Aug. 1878, p. 5.
67 Radics, Das befreite Bosnien, 68.
68 Prager Tagblatt, 20 Aug. 1878, pp. 1–2.
69 Okey notes that the resistance had “significant Serb support in the towns but not in the countryside.” Taming Balkan Nationalism, 23.
70 Bohemia, 16 July 1878, cited in Haselsteiner, H., Bosnien-Hercegovina. Orientkrise und Südslavische Frage (Vienna, 1996), 67Google Scholar.
71 Fremdenblatt, 14 July 1878, cited in Haselsteiner, Bosnien-Hercegovina, 66.
72 Die Occupation Bosniens und der Hercegovina durch k.k. Truppen im Jahre 1878 (Vienna, 1879), appendix, p. xGoogle Scholar.
73 von Holtz, Georg Freiherr, Die letzten Kämpfe und der Heimmarsch 1878 (Vienna, 1908), 41Google Scholar.
74 Fremdenblatt, 17 Aug. 1878, cited in Haselsteiner, Bosnien-Hercegovina, 69.
75 Karpat, “The Ottoman Attitude,” 160.
76 Haremslogik. Bohemia, 7 Aug. 1878, cited in Haselsteiner, Bosnien-Hercegovina, 70.
77 Beck, Joseph, Banjaluka-Jajce (Vienna, 1908), 151Google Scholar.
78 Cited in Jezernik, Božidar, Wild Europe: The Balkans in the Gaze of Western Travelers (London, 2004), 139Google Scholar. Chaura, who took part in battles at Vranduk in Aug. 1878, published his account in Czech, Obrázky z okupace bosenské [Pictures from the Bosnian Occupation] in 1893.
79 (Neuigkeits) Welt Blatt, 14 Sept. 1878, p. 2.
80 Beck, Banjaluka-Jajce, 151.
81 Holtz, Die letzten Kämpfe, 86–87.
82 Die Occupation Bosniens und der Hercegovina durch k.k. Truppen im Jahre 1878, 53–55. In this official report, the Habsburg General Staff estimated that roughly forty thousand Ottoman troops had been present during the military occupation.
83 (Neuigkeits) Welt Blatt, 24 Aug. 1878, p. 5.
84 “Falsche Türken,” Znaimer Wochenblatt, 7 Sept. 1878, p. 13.
85 “Türkische Kriegsgefangene in Olmütz,” Znaimer Wochenblatt, 7 Sept. 1878, p. 13.
86 Linzer Tages-Post, 17 Sept. 1878, p. 4.
87 “Antheilnahme der Occupations-Truppen und der Heeres-Verwaltung an den Massnahmen zur Förderung der materiellen und culturellen Entwicklung Bosniens und der Hercegovina,” Organ der militärwissenschaftlichen Vereine XXIV (Vienna, 1882), 31Google Scholar.
88 Moriz Bock, “Der Ausbau der Eisenbahnbrücke über die Save bei Brod, 1882–1884, im Auftrage des k.k. Reichs-Kriegs-Ministeriums (Vienna, 1885), 3.
89 Wiener Zeitung, 18 Sept. 1885, p. 1.
90 Neue Freie Presse, 31 May 1910, p. 4.
91 On efforts to create a Bosnian “national” identity, see Aydın Babuna, “The Story of Bošnjaštvo,” in Ruthner et al., Wechselwirkungen, 123–38; Hajdarpasic, chapter five. On Bosnians in Habsburg armed forces, see Neumayer, Christoph and Schmidl, Erwin A., eds., Des Kaisers Bosniaken. Die bosnisch-herzegowinischen Truppen in der k.u.k. Armee (Vienna, 2008), esp. 126–85Google Scholar; Schachinger, Werner, Die Bosniaken kommen! Elitetruppe in der k.u.k. Armee, 1879–1918 (Graz, 1989)Google Scholar.
92 von Hirschhausen, Béatrice et al. , “Phantom Borders in Eastern Europe: A New Concept for Regional Research,” Slavic Review 78, no. 2 (Summer 2019): 368–89, here 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
93 Schneider, Siegmund and Imendörffer, Benno, Mein Österreich, mein Heimatland. Illustrierte Volks- und Vaterlandskunde des österreichischen Kaiserstaates, vol. 2 (Vienna, 1914), 498–99Google Scholar.