Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:00:57.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Friedrich Gottas
Friedrich Gottas
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
National Interests and Cosmopolitan Goals in the Hungarian Revolution of 1848–1849
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 9 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Révész, László, “Das Junge Ungarn 1825–1848,” Südosl-Forschungen, Vol. XXV (1966), pp. 72–119.Google Scholar

2 See especially Barta, Istvan, “Entstehung des Gedankens der Interessenvereinigung in der ungarischen bürgerlich-adligen Reformbewegung,” in Nouvelles études historiques publiées á I'occasion du Xlle Congrés International par la Commission Nationale des Historiens Hongrois (2 vols., Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 1965). Vol. 1, p. 507Google Scholar; Csáky, Moritz, Der Kulturkampf in Ungarn. Die kirchenpolitische Geselzgebung der Jahre 1894–95. In Studien zur Geschichte der österreichisch-ungarischen Monarchie, Vol. VI (Graz: Böhlau, 1967), pp. 14 and 16Google Scholar; and Gottas, Friedrich, “Liberalismus und Nationalismus im ungarischen Reformzeitalter (1825–1848). Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der ersten Phase der Reformbewegung.” Österreichische Osthefte, Vol. XVIII (1976), p. 38.Google Scholar