Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:42:38.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Raymond Grew
Affiliation:
University of Michigan

Extract

In the course of his survey of Italian nationalism in the Austrian empire—an account written with scrupulous fairness—Professor Greenfield makes, it seems to me, three particularly important points. First, though he finds these matters hard to measure, he suggests that irredentist sentiment was probably less intense, universal, or consistent than prior studies implied. Second, he notes that Austria protected herself from irredentism more through diplomatic than through domestic policy and that this approach was for some time fairly effective. Third, he finds that the Italian population became more anti-imperial as it felt itself threatened by the nationalism of Germans and Slavs and by what seemed to be Vienna's preferential treatment of them. The Italians in the Habsburg empire thus contributed to its disintegration primarily after the empire came to be conceived of as a system of competing nationalities in which concessions to any one of them became a source of grievance for some other national group. At the same time, an empire of declining international power found diplomacy an inadequate restraint on its increasingly independent Italian neighbor.

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Greenfield, Kent Roberts, Economics and Liberalism in the Risorgimento (2nd ed., Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965).Google Scholar