Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:02:24.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Attitudes Toward People With Mental Illness in New Zealand, 1995–1996

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Nikolaos Kazantzis ,
Amber Wakefield ,
Frank P. Deane ,
Kevin R. Ronan  and
Malcolm Johnson
Nikolaos Kazantzis*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Australia. [email protected]
Amber Wakefield
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand.
Frank P. Deane
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Australia.
Kevin R. Ronan
Affiliation:
Central Queensland University, Australia.
Malcolm Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Auckland, New Zealand.
*
*Address for correspondence: Nikolaos Kazantzis, School of Psychological Science, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

Archival data from a cross-sectional survey of two cohorts of community-residing New Zealand adults (n = 157; n = 141) was analysed to examine social attitudes towards people with mental illness in a historical period associated with the establishment of a community mental health facility. Participants completed the Opinions about Mental Illness (OMI; Cohen & Struening, 1959), and the Comfort in Interaction Scale (CI, Beckwith & Mathews, 1994); the latter a measure of level of prior contact with people with mental illness. Across cohorts, the OMI Mental Hygiene subscale and the CI scale had significant variability. Older participants endorsed more Authoritarian, Social Restrictiveness and Interpersonal Ideology attitudes in their perception of people with mental illness than younger participants. Data supported the hypothesis that attitudes towards people with mental illness were influenced by social attitudes, and by opportunities to interact with people with mental illness in work settings.

Keywords

public attitudesmental illnessNew Zealandsurvey
Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , 01 November 2009 , pp. 74 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)