Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:20:59.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pluralistic Dialogue: A Grounded Theory of Interdisciplinary Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2015

Antoinette M. McCallin
Antoinette M. McCallin*
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand
*
School of Health Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102904, North Shore MSC, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This grounded theory study explains how health professionals work in interdisciplinary teams in health services where the call for new collaborations is intensifying. Forty-four participants from four teams in two major acute-care hospitals participated in the study. In total there were eighty hours of interviewing and eighty hours of participant observation. All data were constantly compared and analysed using Glaser's emergent approach to grounded theory. Underpinning the study are the premises of symbolic interactionism that are assumed to shape the focus of this study, team interactions, and collective action within an acute care setting. The study participants' patterns of behaviour would suggest that, when interdisciplinary practice is well established, an attitude of cooperative inquiry pervades joint actions and interactions that focus on meeting service needs.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , 1999 , pp. 78 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, B.G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
McCallin, A.M. (1999). Pluralistic dialogue: A grounded theory of interdisciplinary practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D., & Tjosvold, M.T. (1994). Cooperation, competition, and constructive controversy: Knowledge to empower for self-managing work teams. Advances in Interdisaplinary Studies of Work Teams, 1, 119–144.Google Scholar
Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (1994). The quantum society: Mind, physics, and a new social vision. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar