Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:42:13.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of Core Competency Status and Work Environment of Residential Mental Health Support Workers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Niall Morrison*
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand
Kevin Ronan
Affiliation:
Massey University, New Zealand
*
PO Box 337, Hastings, New Zealand, Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The present study explored the current competency status of New Zealand residential mental health support workers (n = 121). Competency was assessed through the domains of skills, attitudes and perception of the work environment. Consistent with a recovery model, the National Mental Health Workforce Development Coordinating Committee (1999) put forward 10 basic core competencies that they recommended that all mental health workers should be able to demonstrate in their work practice. Skills and attitudes self-report measures were developed to assess participant performance on these competencies. In addition, a standard measure, the Ward Atmosphere Scale (Moos, 1996), was utilised to evaluate the perceived atmosphere of the participants' work environment. The aggregated results of this study appeared to show that participants were generally competent in a number of areas of work practice. However, deficiencies in critical areas of client support were identified on closer examination of the data. While superior education and training did appear to influence performance on certain competencies, some deficiencies were nevertheless reported by the more highly educated and trained participants. In addition, participants generally characterised their work settings in a negative manner such that it appears that many settings are not adhering to the philosophies of rehabilitation and recovery. Despite the identification of specific deficiencies, many participants did demonstrate a number of competencies combined with an encouraging commitment to professional growth.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergevin, L. (2000). The complex problem of evaluating competency. Retrieved 5 03, 2000, from http://www.otrq.qc.ca/english/inspection/EvaluatingCompetency.htmGoogle Scholar
Bratt, A., & Johnson, R. (1988). Changes in lifestyle for young adults with profound handicaps following discharge from hospital care into a “second generation” housing project. Mental Handicap Research, 1(1), 4974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherniss, C., & Egnatios, E. (1978). Is There Job Satisfaction in Community Mental Health? Community Mental Health Journal, 14(4), 309318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, M., & Hughes, F. (1996). Mental Health Workforce skills Analysis. Wellington: Central Regional Health Authority.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Struening, E.L. (1962). Opinions about mental illness in the personnel of two large mental hospitals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(5), 349360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coursey, R.D., Curtis, L., Marsh, D.T., Campbell, J., Harding, C., Spaniol, L., et al. (2000). Competencies for direct service staff members who work with adults with severe mental illnesses: Specific knowledge, attitudes, skills, and bibliography. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23(4), 378392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, G.C., & Neale, J.M. (1998). Abnormal psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Ellis, P.M., & Collings, S.C.D. (1997). Biological, social and economic risk factors. In Ellis, P.M., & Collings, S.C.D. (Eds.), Mental health in New Zealand from a public health perspective (pp. 3782). Wellington: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
Ernst & Young. (1996). 1995 Stocktake of mental health services. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health and Joint RHAs.Google Scholar
Farkas, M. (1982). Training the mental health staff of a state psychiatric hospital in rehabilitation skills. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 5(1), 2328.Google Scholar
Kaplan, H.I., & Sadock, B.J. (1998). Synopsis of psychiatry. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Lahti, R.K. (1999). Identifying and integrating individual level and organisational level core competencies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(1), 5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloney, K. (1992). Defining competence by developing standards. In Saunders, D., & Race, P. (Eds.), Developing and measuring competence (pp. 101105). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Moos, R.H. (1997). Evaluating treatment environments: The quality of psychiatric and substance abuse programs. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Moos, R.H. (1996). Ward Atmosphere Scale Manual. Palo Alto, Calif: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
Morrison, N.P. (2000). The assessment of competency status of residential mental health support workers. Unpublished Manuscript, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
National Mental Health Workforce Development Co-ordinating Committee. (1999, 07). Developing the mental health workforce. Wellington: Author.Google Scholar
Oberlander, L.B. (1990). Work Satisfaction Among Community-Based Mental Health Service Providers: The Association Between Work Environment and Work Satisfaction. Community Mental Health Journal, 26(6), 517532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeiffer, S.I. (1990). An analysis of methodology in follow-up studies of adult in-patient psychiatric treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41(12), 13151321.Google Scholar
Ponterotto, J.G. (1996). Evaluating and Selecting Research Instruments, in Leong, F.T.L., & Austin, J. T. (Eds.), The Psychology research handbook (pp. 7384). Thousand Oaks California: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (1997). Mental Health Workforce-Issues in New Zealand. In Goslyn, A. (Ed.), Mental health — A Review of 1997 (pp. 9599). Auckland: National Centre for Information and Promotion of Mental Health, Mental Health Foundation.Google Scholar