Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:44:18.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching and Evaluating Rehabilitation Case Management Skills Through Computer Simulations: Methodological Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2015

Chris Reid ,
Fong Chan ,
Daniel W. Wong ,
Joe Wheaton  and
Nancy M. Long
Chris Reid
Affiliation:
Louisiana Stale University
Fong Chan*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Daniel W. Wong
Affiliation:
Hofstra University
Joe Wheaton
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Nancy M. Long
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
*
Department of Rehabilitation Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 432 N. Murray Street, Madison, WI53706, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The use of computer simulations in professional rehabilitation counselling training has received considerable attention in recent years. Most notably, computer-based rehabilitation case management simulations have been developed for teaching and evaluating clinical problem solving skills of rehabilitation counselling trainees. However, a major problem confronting the use of computer simulations in professional rehabilitation training is the lack of quantification procedures for measuring performance on computer simulations. A current approach involves the computation of proficiency and efficiency indices as performance feedback measures. The purpose of this paper, however, is to demonstrate the potential problems with using these two indices as feedback mechanisms in computer simulations and to present an alternative quantification procedure for measuring and providing feedback about trainee performance on computer-based case management simulations.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , 1995 , pp. 93 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berven, N. L. (1985a). Computer technology in professional education. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29, 26–41.Google Scholar
Berven, N. L. (1985b). Reliability and validity of standardized case management simulations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berven, N. L. (1987). Improving evaluation in counselor training and credentialing through standardized simulations. In Edelstein, B. A. & Berler, E. S. (Eds.), Evaluation and accountability in clinical training (pp. 203–229). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berven, N. L., & Herbert, L. J. (1977). Complete-link clustering as a complement to factor analysis: A comparison to factor analysis used alone. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 10, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berven, N. L., & Scofield, M. E. (1980a). Evaluation of clinical problem solving skills through standardized case management simulations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berven, N. L., & Scofield, M. E. (1980b). Evaluation of professional competence through standardized simulations: A review. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 24, 178–202.Google Scholar
Braun, L. (1980). Computers in learning environments: An imperative for the 1980s. Byte, 5(7), 6–10.Google Scholar
Chan, F., Rosen, A., Wong, D.W., & Kaplan, (1993). Evaluating rehabilitation caseload management skills through computer simulations. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(5), 493–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, F., Parker, H. J., Lam, C. S., Mecaskey, C., & Malphurs, L. (1987). Computer case management simulations: Applications in rehabilitation education. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 30, 210–217.Google Scholar
Chan, E., Berven, N. L., & Lam, C. S. (1990). Computer-based, case management simulations in the training of rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 33, 212–228.Google Scholar
Chubon, R. (1986). Genesis II: A computer-based case management simulation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 30, 25–32.Google Scholar
Frenzel, L. (1980). The personal computer — Last chance for CAI? Byte, 5(7), 86–96.Google Scholar
Gerhold, G. A. (1978). Teaching with a microcomputer. Byte, 3(12), 124–126.Google Scholar
Klecka, W. R. (1987). Discriminant analysis (Sage Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 19). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Klemp, G. O. (1979). Identifying, measuring, and integrating competence. In Porringer, P. S. & Goldsmith, J. (Eds.), New directions for experiential learning: No. 3, Defining and measuring competence (pp. 41–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McGuire, C. H., & Babbott, D. (1967). Simulation technique in the measurement of problem solving skills. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norusis, M. J. (1985). SPSS-X advanced statistics guide. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. (1979). Computer technology in medical education. Washington D. C: Congress of the United States.Google Scholar
Trampisch, H. J. (1976). A discriminant analysis for qualitative data with interactions. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 6, 50–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, J. W. (1965). Assessing clinical judgment. Journal of Medical Education, 40, 180–186.Google ScholarPubMed