Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:39:18.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘What matters is the girth of its belly. Can it swallow us or not?’ — Shifting Values Towards New Models of Teaching in Aboriginal Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

R.G. Smith
R.G. Smith*
Affiliation:
Dripstone High School, Darwin
Get access

Extract

At a maths workshop we were discussing measurement as a cultural concept. One of the balanda staff asked an Aboriginal colleague how he might depict the length of a crocodile. Another Aboriginal teacher laughed. ‘You balanda always think length is important. What matters to us is the girth of the belly. Can it swallow us or not!’

Territory-wide the government, through its Department of Education, has the unenviably difficult task of maintaining and providing education which is both equitable and accessible to a cohort of students who represent a third of its student population. While their common qualifier is that these students are ‘Indigenous,’ their disparate worldviews often only share some common features. It seems that in recent years, rather than meet these diverse needs the department has determined that the only way around the difficulty is to apply a relatively prescriptive curriculum to its remote Indigenous schools. This is evidenced by the Intensive English, Foundation and General Studies programs now in place for secondary aged students. Many (including Indigenous) educators argue that perhaps this is the only pragmatic answer.

Type
Section A: Schools
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , April 1997 , pp. 10 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassett, G.W., Jacka, B. and Logan, L. (1990) The Modern Primary School in Australia. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 211–250.Google Scholar
Bruner, J.S. (1983), ‘Intuitive and analytical thinking.’ In Donaldson, Margaret, Grieve, Robert and Pratt, Chris (Eds), Early Childhood Development and Education, Readings in Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers, pp. 237–244.Google Scholar
Bruner, J.S. .Goodnow, J.J. and Austin, G.A. (1967) A Study of Thinking. New York: Science Editions, Inc.Google Scholar
Capper, Phillip (1994) ‘Devolved school management: the market wolf in the democratic sheep's clothing.’ In Martin, R., McCollow, J., McFarlane, L., McMurdo, G., Graham, J. and Hull, R. (Eds), Devolution, Decentralisation and Recentralisation — The Structure of Australian Schooling. South Melbourne: Australian Teachers' Union, pp. 37–39.Google Scholar
Christie, Michael J. and Young, Robyn M. (1995) Critical Incidents in Vocational Teaching — A Northern Territory Study. Darwin: Northern Territory University.Google Scholar
D-BATE Students (1988) ‘Thinking about an Aboriginal teaching style.’ Ngoonjook, Batchelor Journal of Aboriginal Education JulyGoogle Scholar
De Bono, Edward (1990) Six Thinking Hats. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gage, N.L. (1978) The Scientific Basis of the Art of Teaching. Columbia University, New York: Teachers' College Press.Google Scholar
Gagné, R.M, Briggs, L.J. and Wager, W.W. (1988) Principles of Instructional Design, 3rd edn. Orlando, Florida: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Gordon, W.J.J. (1961) Synectics. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Harris, Stephen (1992) ‘“Going about it the right way” — decolonising Aboriginal school curriculum processes.’ Keynote address to UNESCO Sub-Regional Seminar on Education for Cultural Development, Rarotonga, Cook Islands, 4–9 February.Google Scholar
Harris, Stephen (1994) ‘Teaching Aboriginal languages in Aboriginal schools: some issues.’ In Hartman, Deborah and Henderson, John (Eds), Aboriginal Languages in Education. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, B., Weil, M. and Showers, B. (1992) Models of Teaching, 4th edn. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. and Mayer, R. (1972) ‘Development as the aim of education.’ Harvard Educational Review 42(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero-Sieburth, Martha (1992) ‘Models and practice of curriculum change in developing countries.’ Comparative Education Review 36(2): 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C.R. (1969) Freedom to Learn. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. MerrillGoogle Scholar
Taba, Hilda (1966) Teaching Strategies and Cognitive Functioning in Elementary School Children, Cooperative Research Project 2404. San Francisco: San Francisco State College.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G.R. (1992) ‘The contribution of education to the survival of small Indigenous cultures.’ Invited paper prepared for the 43rd Session of the International Conference on Education, Geneva, 14–19 September.Google Scholar
Weil, M. and Joyce, B. (1978a) Information Processing Models of Teaching. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Weil, M., Joyce, B. and Kluwin, B.(1978b) Personal Models of Teaching. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar