Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:34:54.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inclusive and Empowering Discourse in an Early Childhood Literacy Classroom with Indigenous Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Anne Thwaite
Anne Thwaite*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Edith Cowan University, Bradford Street, Mt Lawley, Western Australia, 6050, Australia
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the classroom discourse and strategies of Marcia, an early childhood teacher of a class with a high percentage of Indigenous Australian students. These students have been demonstrably successful on standardised literacy tests, which is not the case for Indigenous students in general in Australia (e.g., MCEETYA, 200). It will be suggested here that Marcia’s approach and relationships with the students, as constructed in her discourse, have been a large contributing factor in this success. Marcia’s discourse can be described as both inclusive and empowering and, as such, it will be proposed that awareness of her techniques may be of benefit to teachers who are working with groups whom education systems tend to marginalise and disempower. Marcia’s lessons were observed as part of the project, “Teaching Indigenous Students with Conductive Hearing Loss in Remote and Urban Schools of Western Australia”. This project was based in Kurongkurl Katitjin, School of Indigenous Studies, at Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, and was funded by an Australian Research Council Strategic Partnerships with Industry [SPIRT] Grant and the industry partners: Department of Education of Western Australia, Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia and Aboriginal Independent Community Schools, Western Australia.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , 2007 , pp. 21 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, M. (1981a). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Coulthard, M. & Montgomery, M. (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, (pp. 120–145. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981b). Polarity, ellipticity and propositional development, their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 10, 1, 36–63.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (1981c). Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network, 2, 23–32.Google Scholar
Cahill, R. (1999). Solid English. Perth, WA: Education Department of western Australia. Google Scholar
Education Department of Western Australia. (1997). First steps spelling resource book. Melbourne, VIC: Rigby Heinemann. Google Scholar
Lessonlab. (2005). Retrieved 25 September, 2005, from http://www.lessonlab.com.Google Scholar
Lipka, J. (1998). Transforming the culture of schools. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Ludwig, C., & Herschell, P. (1996). Talking: Our way into literacy. Melbourne, VIC: Curriculum Corporation. Google Scholar
Malcolm, I., (1998). “You gotta talk the proper way”: Language and education. In Partington, G. (Ed.), Perspectives on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education (pp. 117–146). Tuggerah, NSW: Social Science Press. Google Scholar
Malcolm, I., Haig, Y., Konigsberg, P., Rochecouste, J., Collard, G., Hill, A. & Cahill, R. (1999). Two-way English. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia. Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: power, solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49, 179–200.Google Scholar
Martin, J.R., & Rose, D. (2005). Designing literacy pegagogy: Scaffolding democracy in the classroom. In Webster, J. Matthiessen, C. & Hasan, R. (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language (pp. 251–280). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA) (2003). Positive discourse analysis: power, solidarity and change. National report on schooling in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: MCEETYA.Google Scholar
Rose, J.D., Gray, B., & Cowey, W. (1999). Scaffolding reading and writing for Indigenous children in school. In Wignell, P. Double power: English literacy in Indigenous schooling. (pp. 23–60). Melbourne, VIC: Language Australia.Google Scholar
Rose, J.D., Lui-Chivizhe, L., McKnight, A. &Smith, A. (2004). Scaffolding academic reading and writing at the Koori Centre. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 32, 41–49).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standards for teachers of English language and literacy in Australia [STELLA]. (2005). Retrieved 5 September, 2005, from http://www.stella.org.au.Google Scholar
Thwaite, A., (2004). Classroom discourse of an experienced teacher of Indigenous children. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 2, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar