Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:20:58.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenging Lecturer Assumptions About Preservice Teacher Learning in Mandatory Indigenous Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2016

Katrina Thorpe  and
Cathie Burgess Open the ORCID record for Cathie Burgess [Opens in a new window]
Katrina Thorpe*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
Cathie Burgess
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Katrina Thorpe, Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper explores and challenges our assumptions as lecturers about preservice teachers’ knowledge and beliefs entering a mandatory Indigenous Studies subject. A total of 38 focus groups were conducted over two years (2011–2012) with preservice teachers enrolled in teaching degrees at the University of Sydney. Findings were analysed to identify and critically reflect on our assumptions about preservice teachers' prior understanding of the content and approaches to learning. To challenge our assumptions, this paper applies Brookfield's (1995) student and autobiographical lenses to engage in critical reflection and Nakata's (2002, 2007) ‘cultural interface’ to better understand the complexities, tensions and transformations that occur for learners in the Indigenous Studies classroom. Findings illuminated that assumptions about the level of resistance and indifference to course content were often overstated and rather, many preservice teachers were more likely to be insecure and reticent to express their ideas in this complex and potentially uncomfortable learning environment. Implications from the study highlight the need for ongoing critical reflection of lecturer assumptions about preservice teachers’ dispositions and how they engage with the subject to better understand the diversity of their knowledge and experiences and what this means for teaching and learning in this context.

Keywords

Indigenous studiesIndigenous educationpreservice teachersscholarship of teaching and learning
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , December 2016 , pp. 119 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlquist, R. (1991). Position and imposition: Power relations in a multicultural foundations class. The Journal of Negro Education, 60 (2), 158–169. doi: 10.2307/2295607.Google Scholar
Asmar, C., & Page, S. (2009). Sources of satisfaction and stress among Indigenous academic teachers: Findings from a national Australian study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29 (3), 387–401. doi: 10.1080/02188790903097505.Google Scholar
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved 22 June 2015, from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list Google Scholar
Aveling, N. (2006). Hacking at our very roots: Rearticulating white racial identity within the context of teacher education. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 9 (3), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, L.E. (1991). Teacher education, reflective inquiry, and moral action. In Tabachnick, B.R. & Zeichner, K.M. (Eds.), Inquiry-oriented practices in teacher education (pp. 113–129). New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brookfield, S. (2006). The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Buckskin, J. (2012). Teacher preparation for Aboriginal education. (Phd), The University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3694.Google Scholar
Burgess, C., & Cavanagh, P. (2012). Real stories, extraordinary people. Preliminary findings from an Aboriginal community-controlled cultural immersion Program for local teachers. Paper presented at the Joint AARE APERA International Conference, Sydney.Google Scholar
Faulkner, J., & Crowhurst, M. (2014). ‘So far multicultural that she is racist to Australians’: Discomfort as a pedagogy for change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22 (3), 389–403. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2014.910251.Google Scholar
Harlow, R. (2003). “Race doesn't matter, but . . .”: The effect of race on Professors' experiences and emotion management in the undergraduate College classroom. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66 (4), 348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, V., Whatman, S., McLaughlin, J., & Sharma-Brymer, V. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical relationships and experiences of embedding Indigenous Australian knowledge in teaching practicum. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42 (5), 703–723. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2012.706480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinsworth, D. (2016). Unsettling Australian settler supremacy: Combating resistance in university Aboriginal studies. Race Ethnicity and Education, 19 (2), 412–432. doi: 10.1080/13613324.2014.911166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32 (3), 465–491. doi: 10.3102/00028312032003465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinlay, E., & Barney, K. (2010). Transformative learning in first year Indigenous Australian studies: Posing problems, asking questions and achieving change. A Practice Report. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 1 (1), 91-n/a. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.27.Google Scholar
Maynard, J. (2007). Circles in the sand: An Indigenous framework of historical practice. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36 (Supplementary), 117–120.Google Scholar
McFalls, E. L., & Cobb-Roberts, D. (2001). Reducing resistance to diversity through cognitive dissonance instruction: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52 (2), 164–172. doi: 10.1177/0022487101052002007.Google Scholar
McGloin, C. (2009). Considering the work of Martin Nakata's 'Cultural interface': a reflection on theory and practice by a non-Indigenous academic. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 38 (2009), 36–41.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J. (2013). 'Crack in the pavement': Pedagogy as political and moral practice for educating culturally competent professionals. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12 (1), 249–265.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In Mezirow, J. & (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mooney, J., & Craven, R. (2005). Case study: Introducing and Teaching Core Aboriginal Studies. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education 2005 International Education Research Conference, Parramatta. http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/moo05313.pdf.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the cultural interface: underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems. IFLA, 28 (5/6), 281–291.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2004). Ongoing conversations about aboriginal and torres strait islander research agendas and directions. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 33, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). The Cultural Interface. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36 (Supplementary), 7–14.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2012). CDSI Plenary: Widening participation, social inclusion, closing the gap. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 6 (12), 1–8.Google Scholar
Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Keech, S., & Bolt, R. (2012). Decolonial goals and pedagogies for Indigenous studies. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1 (1), 120–140.Google Scholar
Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Keech, S., & Bolt, R. (2014). Rethinking majors in Australian Indigenous Studies. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 43(Special Issue 01), 8–20. doi:10.1017/jie.2014.3.Google Scholar
O'Dowd, M. (2010). 'Ethical positioning' a strategy in overcoming student resistance and fostering engagement in teaching aboriginal history as a compulsory subject to pre-service primary education students. Education in Rural Australia, 20 (1), 29–42.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. (2011). Resisting contradictions: non-Indigenous pre-service teacher responses to critical Indigenous studies. (PhD), Queensland University of Technology, Queensland.Google Scholar
Ma Rhea, Z., & Russell, L. (2012). The invisible hand of pedagogy in Australian Indigenous Studies and Indigenous Education. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41(Special Issue 01), 18–25. doi:10.1017/jie.2012.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, S. (2014). Exploring new conceptualisations of old problems: Researching and reorienting teaching in Indigenous Studies to transform student learning. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 43(Special Issue 01), 21–30. doi:10.1017/jie.2014.4.Google Scholar
Thorpe, K., & Burgess, C. (2012). Pedagogical approaches in a mandatory Indigenous Education subject. The International Journal of Learning, 18 (11), 177–190.Google Scholar
Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J., & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: A model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 (2), 155–168. doi: 10.1080/072943600445628.Google Scholar
Yunkaporta, T. (2009). Aboriginal pedagogies at the cultural interface. (Professional Doctorate), James Cook University. Retrieved from http://eprints.jcu.edu.au/10974/.Google Scholar
Zembylas, M. (2005). Teaching with emotion: A postmodern enactment. United States of America: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar