Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:53:21.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

#A Quotient of Awareness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

J. Kearins
J. Kearins*
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia
Get access

Extract

Since the development of psychological assessments of ‘intelligence’ at about the beginning of this century, many groups of people have been tested. By and large, most have performed at lower levels than people of north-western European origin or ancestry, who belong to the culture within which the tests were devised.

Among the poor performers, with average IQ’s of 80 to 92, have been people of southern and eastern Europe and Caucasian people from further east (Greeks, Yugoslavs, Iranians, Iraqis, Turks, Indians), tested in their homelands, mostly in large numbers and by compatriots, on ‘standard’ non-verbal or translated tests.

These relatively poor performances demonstrate the extent of cultural learning of a particular type involved in most cognitive tests. Presumably, north-western European cultural learning is required for good performances on tests coming from this cultural background, so that children from different backgrounds, even those from other areas of Europe, are likely to be disadvantaged.

Children from more widely different backgrounds, such as those from hunting and gathering groups, can be expected to be disadvantaged even further.

Nevertheless, hunting and gathering people have been tested on Western-type tests, and poor performances interpreted as indicating inferior ability. Kalahari ‘bushmen’ people in the 1930s were assigned a mean mental age of 7.5 by Porteus as a result of their performance on his Maze Test.

In the same period, Aboriginal people of north-west Australia performed poorly on this test, with ages ranging from 8.22 years to 12.17 years for adults. Aboriginal people have performed poorly, but not invariably so, on other tests.

Type
Across Australia …… From Teacher to Teacher
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 24 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fowler, H.L.: Psychological tests on natives in the north-west of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Science, 1940, 2, 124–7.Google Scholar
Kearins, J.: Visual spatial memory in Australian Aboriginal children of desert regions. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Australia, 1977.Google Scholar
Kearins, J.: Visual spatial memory in Australian Aboriginal children of desert regions. Cognitive Psychology, 1981, 13, 434–60.Google Scholar
Lynn, R.: Ethnic and racial differences in intelligence: international comparisons. In Osborne, R.T., Noble, C.E. and Weyl, N. (Eds): Human Variation. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
McElwain, D.W. and Kearney, G.E.: Intellectual development. In Kearney, G.E., de Lacey, P.R. and Davidson, G.R. (Eds): The Psychology of Aboriginal Australians. Sydney: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Porteus, S.D.: The Psychology of a Primitive People. London: Edward Arnold, 1931.Google Scholar
Porteus, S.D.: Porteus Maze Tests: Fifty Years Application. Palo Alto: Pacific Books, 1965.Google Scholar