Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:57:10.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indigenous Autoethnography: Formulating Our Knowledge, Our Way

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Jennifer Houston
Jennifer Houston*
Affiliation:
University Department of Rural Health, University of Tasmania, Launceston Campus, Locked Bag 1372, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia
Get access

Abstract

This paper seeks to engage the cultural interface where Indigenous knowledge meets western academia, by questioning the validity of traditional research methods. Firstly, it is a response to the challenges facing Indigenous people confronted with the ethical and methodological issues arising from academic research. Secondly, it is a journey into academia, where the researcher is all too often forced to remove the “self” from the “subject”; a difficult task for an Aboriginal person involved in research concerning Aboriginal people. Distancing oneself from research is even more difficult if the research is based closer to home, in one's own community.

Therefore, a significant need exists for Indigenous people to conduct and present research in a manner respectful of Indigenous ways of understanding and reflective of the ways in which Indigenous peoples wish to be framed and understood. This need has fuelled the search for Indigenous methodologies, which challenge the imperial basis of Western knowledge and the images of the Indigenous “Other”. The search for appropriate methodologies is part of the process Linda Smith (1999) calls “decolonisation” .

The Indigenous researcher - burdened with the challenge to perform academically rigorous research and the desire to practice this research respectfully - is often overwhelmed with internal conflict. Indigenous autoethnography represents one methodological option to such researchers. Indigenous autoethnography seeks to establish itself as a legitimate and respectful means of acquiring and formulating knowledge, by combining the tradition of storytelling, with the practice of academic research.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 36 , Issue S1: (Re)Contesting Indigenous Knowledges & Indigenous Studies , 2007 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bin-Sallik, M. (Ed.) (2000). Aboriginal women by degrees: Their stories of a journey towards academic achievement. St Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1993).The autobiographical process. In Folkenflik, R. (Ed.), The culture of autobiography: Constructions of self-representation (pp.38–56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. (1997).The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance, and style in ethnographic writing. In Hertz, R. (Ed.), Reflexivity and voice (pp.193–215). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Curthoys, A. (1988). For and against feminism: A personal journey into feminist theory and history. Sydney NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Deck, A. (1990). Autoethnography: Zora Neale Hurston, Noni Jabavu, and cross-disciplinary discourse. Black American Literature Forum, 24(2), 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N.K. (1989). Interpretive biography.London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N.K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century.London: Sage.Google Scholar
Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2003). Strategies of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W.E.B. (1903). The souls of Black folk Cambridge, MA: University Press John Wilson and Son.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. (1995). Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness Philadelphia, PA: Tmple University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. (1997). Evocative ethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives. In Tierney, W.G. & Lincoln, Y.S.(Eds.), Representation and the text: Reframing the narrative voice (pp.115–142). Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. & Bochner, A.P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp.733–768).London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fischer, M.N. (1986). Ethnicity and the post-modern arts of memory In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G.E. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp.194–233).Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gatson, S. (2003). On being amorphous: Autoethnography, genealogy and a multiracial identity. Qualitative Inquiry, 9 (1), 20–48. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J.A., & Holstein, J.A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartman, A. (1992). In search of subjugated knowledge. Social Work, 37,483–484.Google Scholar
hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Huffer, E., & Qalo, R. (2004). Have we been thinking upside-down? The contemporary emergence of Pacific theoretical thought.The Contemporary Pacific,16 (1),87–116. Google Scholar
Jebb, M.A., & Haebich, A. (1992). Across the great divide: Gender relations on Australian frontiers. In Saunders, K. & Evans, R. (Eds.),Gender relations in Australia: Domination and negotiation (pp.20–41).Sydney, NSW: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Jennings, K., & Hollingsworth, D. (1988). Ways of seeing and talking about Aboriginal women: Shy maids and wanton strumpets. Hecate,13 (2),129–133.Google Scholar
Langford, R. (1988). Don't take your love to town. Ringwood, VIC: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Meyer, M.A. (2001). Our own liberation; reflections on Hawaiin epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific,13 (1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M.A. (2005). Remembering our future: Higher education quality assurance and Indigenous epistemology. World Indigenous Nations Higher Education Consortium (WINHEC) Journal, 3, n.p.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ up to the white woman: Aboriginal women and feminism. Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Olson, L.N. (2004). The role of voice in the (re)construction of a battered woman’s identity: An autoethnography of one woman's experiences of abuse.Women's Studies in Communication, 27 (1),1–33.Google Scholar
Pratt, M.L. (1986). Fieldwork in common places. In Clifford, J. & Marcus, G.E. (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp.27–50).Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, M.L. (1994). Transculturation and autoethnography: Peru 1615/1980. In Clifford, J. &Barker, F. Iverson, M. (Eds.), Colonial discourse/postcolonial theory (pp.24–46).Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Reed-Danahay, D.E. (1997). Introduction. In. Reed-Danahay, D.E. (Ed.), Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the social and the self (pp.1–17). New York NY: Berg.Google Scholar
Russel, T. (1998). Autoethnography: Journeys of the self. Retrieved 1 October, 2005, from http://www.haussite.net.Google Scholar
Settelmaier, E. & Taylor, P. (2002, July). Using autobiography to map an interpretive researcher’s sensitivities toward her subject(s). Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australasian Science Educaion Research Association,Townsville, Queensland.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Spry, T. (2001).Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7 (6),706–730.Google Scholar
Staler, A. (1999). Race and the education of desire: Foucault's history of sexuality and the colonial order of things. Durham, NC.University Press.Google Scholar
Subramani, (2001). The oceanic imaginary. The Contemporary Pacific, 13 (1),149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar