Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:04:51.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Difficult Dialogues in the South: Questions about Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

Martin Nakata
Martin Nakata*
Affiliation:
Indigenous Education and Research Centre, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Martin Nakata, Indigenous Education and Research Centre, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This is a reflective opinion piece, on our efforts in Australia to achieve alignment between the goals of Indigenous self-determination, Indigenous studies programmes and decolonising theory for an open and critical dialogue in south–south scholarship agendas. In this spirit, extant approaches to Indigenous studies in the Australian higher education context are questioned, the scholarship recruited for this is challenged, and its advocated role in the education of all students is raised as a major concern.

Keywords

Indigenous studiesdecolonisationcritical dialogue
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 47 , Special Issue 1: South-South Dialogues: Global Approaches to Decolonial Pedagogies , August 2018 , pp. 1 - 7
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is based on research work supported by the Australian Research Council Grant IN120100021.

References

Gordon, L. (2006). Disciplinary decadence: Living thought in trying times. Boulder, London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages — Savaging the disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2010). La Interfaz cultural. Revista Peruna de Investigacion Educativa, 1 (2), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, M. (2014). Disciplinar a los salvajes, violentar las disciplinas. Ecuador: Abya Yala. Retrieved from http://abyayala.org/Abyayala2016/producto/disciplinar-a-los-salvajes-violentar-las-disciplinas-pdf/.Google Scholar
Nakata, M., & David, B. (2010). Archaeological practice at the cultural interface. In Lydon, J. & Rizvi, U. (Eds.), Handbook of postcolonial archaeology (pp. 429–444). California: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Nakata, M., Nakata, V., & Chin, M. (2008). Approaches to the academic preparation and support of Australian Indigenous students for tertiary studies. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37 (S1), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Keech, S., & Bolt, R. (2012). Decolonial goals and pedagogies for Indigenous Studies. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1 (1), 120–140.Google Scholar
Nakata, N.M. (2013). The rights and blights of the politics in Indigenous higher education. Anthropological Forum: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology, 23 (3), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar