Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:40:37.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Young People and the Environment: Predicting Ecological Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Monica Thielking  and
Susan Moore
Monica Thielking
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology
Susan Moore
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this study was to assess the environmental attitudes, knowledge and behaviours of young people aged 11 - 16 years, and evaluate which factors best predict ecological behaviour, through testing the Model of Responsible Environmental Behaviour' (Hines, Hungerford & Tomera 1986-1987). Results indicted that while young people are not negatively disposed toward the environment, they have limited knowledge about the issues. Perceived personal responsibility toward the environment was shown to be the strongest predictor of ecological behaviour, followed by ‘action skills’ for boys and knowledge levels for girls.

To what extent are young people committed to or apathetic about environmental conservation, and what do they see as the barriers with respect to taking environmental action? One aim of the study reported in this paper was to assess the environmental attitudes, knowledge and behaviours of young people aged 11 - 16, and to assess gender differences in these variables. A second aim was to evaluate which factors best predict ecological behaviour in young people, through testing a model which incorporates environmental knowledge, attitudes, perceived action skills, beliefs about personal responsibility, and other personal factors as potential predictors. This ‘Model of Responsible Environmental Behaviour’ (Hines, Hungerford & Tomera 1986-1987) has not been previously applied to the prediction of adolescent ecological behaviour, by which we mean ‘any action taken to ensure that ecological relationships among living things do not deteriorate’ (Caltabiano & Caltabiano 1995, p. 1080).

Young people's relationships to the environment are important developmentally, and because adolescents are the ‘next generation’ of potential activists for environmental concerns. The task of identity formation (or development of a ‘sense of self’) in adolescence has been conceptualised as including the shaping and maturing of a personal ideology, with its associated beliefs, values, and behaviours (Erikson 1971, Kroger 1989). Marcia (1966) using Erikson's framework, conceived of ideology as incorporating views about religion and politics. However as social concerns change, so might the importance of different content areas for the formulation of ideology (Bennion & Adams 1986). For young people today, thinking about environmental concerns and dilemmas may be part of their identity development in the sense that such thoughts may be part of forming an ideology about the world. In Australia, the National Union of Students surveyed 7,400 students in 1990 and found that ‘the environment was hottest election issue amongst university students in Australia’ (cited in Youth Research Centre 1991, p. 3). Similar findings of strong environmental concern have been found in a range of other Australian studies of adolescent populations (Clark 1996, Connell el al. 1998, Iiving Saulwick & Associates 2000, Sykes, Yencken. Fien & Choo 2000). Environmental concerns involve several aspects, including attitudes toward the environment, knowledge of issues, and participation in pro-environmental behaviour. It is to these topics that we now turn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 17 , 2001 , pp. 63 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

References

Ajzen, I. and Madden, T.J. 1985, ‘Prediction of Goal-Directed Behaviour: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioural Control’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 453–471.Google Scholar
Arcury, T.A., Johnson, T.P. and Scollay, S.J. 1986, ‘Ecological Worldview and Environmental Knowledge: The ‘New Environmental Paradigm’, The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 17, pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
Bennion, L. and Adams, G. 1986, ‘A Revision of the Extended Version of the Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status: An Identity Instrument for use with Late Adolescents’, Journal of Adolescent Research, vol. 1, pp. 183–198.Google Scholar
Blum, A. 1987, ‘Students’ Knowledge and Beliefs Concerning Environmental Issues in Four Countries’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 18, pp. 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldero, J. 1995, ‘The Prediction of Household Recycling of Newspapers: The Role of Attitudes, Intentions, and Situational Factors’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 25, pp. 440–462.Google Scholar
Boyes, E., and Stanisstreet, M. 1998, ‘High School Students’ Perceptions of how Major Global Environmental Effects Might Cause Skin Cancer’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 29, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
Caltabiano, N.J. and Caltabiano, M.L. 1995, ‘Assessing Environmentally Responsible Behaviour’, Psychological Reports, vol. 76, pp. 1080–1082.Google Scholar
Clarke, B. 1996, ‘Environmental Attitudes and Knowledge of Year 11 Students in a Queensland High School’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 12, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H. and Yencken, D. 1999, ‘If it doesn't Directly Effect you, you don't think about it: A Qualitative Study of Young People's Environmental Attitudes in two Australian Cities’, Environmental Education Research, vol. 5, pp. 95–114.Google Scholar
Connell, S., Fien, J., Sykes, H. and Yencken, D. 1998, ‘Young People and the Environment in Australia: Beliefs, Knowledge, Commitment and Educational Implications’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 14, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R.E. and Van Liere, K.D. 1978, ‘The “New Environmental Paradigm”.’ Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 9, pp. 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, R. 1999, ‘Dreams and Expectations: Young People's Expected and Preferred Futures and their Significance for Education’, Futures, vol. 31, pp. 73–90.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. 1971, Identity, Youth and Crisis, Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
Fien, J. 2000, ‘Listening to the Voice of Youth: Implications for Educational Reform’ in Yencken, D., Fien, J. and Sykes, H. eds, Environment, Education and Society in the Asia-Pacific: Local Traditions and Discourses, Routledge, London, (pp. 251–275).Google Scholar
Gambro, J.S. and Switzky, H.N. 1996, ‘A National Survey of High School Students’ Environmental Knowledge', Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 27, pp. 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigliotti, L.M. 1990, ‘Environmental Education: What Went Wrong? What can be Done?’ The Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 22, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
Hampel, B., Boldero, J. and Holdsworth, R. 1996, ‘Gender Patterns in Environmental Consciousness among Adolescents’, Australian New Zealand Journal of Sociology, vol. 32, pp. 58–71.Google Scholar
Hausbeck, K.W., Milbrath, L.W. and Enright, S.M. 1992, ‘Environmental Knowledge, Awareness and Concern among 11th-grade Students: New York State’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 24, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. and Tomera, A.N. 1986–1987, ‘Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 18, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Irving Saulwick & Associates 2000, Attitudes of Young People to Conservation and the Environment, Melbourne Water and The Australian Conservation Foundation, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Kaiser, F.G. 1998, ‘A General Measure of Ecological Behavior’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 28, pp. 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroger, J. 1989, Identity in Adolescence: The Balance between Self and Other, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Kuhlemeier, H., Bergh, H.V. and Langerweij, N. 1999, ‘Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior in Dutch Secondary Education’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 30, pp. 4–15.Google Scholar
Kwan, T. and Miles, J. 1998, ‘In the Words of Children and Young People: The Opinions and Concerns about their Environments of some Brisbane School Students’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 14, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Macdonald, W.L. and Hara, N. 1994, ‘Gender Differences in Environmental Concern among College Students’, Sex Roles, vol. 31, pp. 69–374.Google Scholar
Marcia, J. 1966, ‘Development and Validation of Ego-Identity Status’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 551–558.Google Scholar
Nowicki, S. and Strickland, B. 1973, ‘A Locus of Control Scale for Children’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 40, pp. 148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, M.E., Lodwick, D.G. and Dunlap, R.E. 1992, Viewing the World Ecologically, Westview Press, Colorado.Google Scholar
Rockland, D.B. 1995, ‘Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors of American Students’, Environmental Protection Agency Journal, vol. 21, pp. 12–14.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.W. and Zelezny, L.C. 1998, ‘Values and Proenvironmental Behavior: A Five-Country Survey’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 540–558.Google Scholar
Scott, D. and Willits, F.K. 1994, ‘Environmental Attitudes and Behavior’, Environment and Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 239–262.Google Scholar
Stern, P.C. and Oskamp, S. 1987, ‘Managing Scarce Environmental Resources’, in Stokols, D. and Altman, I. eds, Handbook of Environmental Psychology: Vol. 2, Wiley, New York, pp. 1043–1088.Google Scholar
Sykes, H., Yencken, D., Fien, J. and Choo, F. 2000, ‘Young People and the Environment: Attitudes, Knowledge and Behaviour’, in Yencken, D., Fien, J. and Sykes, H. eds, Environment, Education and Society in the Asia-Pacific: Local Traditions and Discourses, Routledge, London, pp. 189–220.Google Scholar
Van Liere, K.D. and Dunlap, R.E. 1981, ‘Environmental Concern: Does it make a Difference how it's Measured?’ Environment and Behavior, vol. 13, pp. 651–676.Google Scholar
Wearing, B. 1984, ‘The Impact of Changing Patterns of Family Living on Identity Formation in Late Adolescence’, Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family, vol. 5, pp. 16–24.Google Scholar
Widegren, O. 1998, ‘The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms’, Environment and Behaviour, vol. 30, pp. 75–100.Google Scholar
Yencken, D. 2000, ‘Young People and the Environment: The Implications for Environmentalism’, in Yencken, D., Fien, J. and Sykes, H. eds, Environment, Education and Society in the Asia-Pacific: Local Traditions and Discourses, Routledge, London, pp. 221–250.Google Scholar
Yencken, D., Fien, J. and Sykes, H. (eds) 2000, Environment, Education and Society in the Asia-Pacific: Local Traditions and Discourses, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Youth Research Centre 1991, Young People and the Environmental Movement: Research Report No. 5, The University of Melbourne Institute of Education, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar