Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:38:22.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

We found a body: The intrabody of human, technology, narrative and environment as postqualitative inquiry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2022

Cassandra Tytler*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper explores the potential for a mode of postqualitative inquiry as generative knowledge-affect by looking towards the practice-led in-progress intermedial project, We Found A Body. The project functions as a form of urban play in a way that decentres and reconstructs participants so that their bodies, their technology and the environment they ‘play’ in become intertwined. I use a posthumanist queer reading of performativity (Barad, 2003, 2011) coupled with an affect-focused study of world-making (Harris & Jones, 2019) alongside a politics of affect to analyse how We Found a Body, in its potential for intraaction of human, technology, narrative and environment, can reconfigure and intertwine bodies and matter in a dynamic and embodied way. I argue that creative intermedial practice can produce counternarratives where new modes of belonging within space and time exist, and where extended ways of being human are at play (Myers, 2020). This is a space where the artwork acts as a performative call to action where iterative materialisation creates an intrabody of the human and more-than-human and opens up future methods within postqualitative inquiry.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful subjects. Duke University Press, 10.1515/9780822376101 Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801831. DOI 10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, 10.1515/9780822388128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2011). Nature’s queer performativity. Qui Parle, 19(2), 121158. DOI 10.5250/quiparle.19.2.0121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Edbauer Rice, J. (2008). The New “New”: Making a case for critical affect studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94(2), 200212. DOI 10.1080/00335630801975434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G.J. (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, D.J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, 10.1515/9780822373780 Google Scholar
Haraway, D.J. (1997). [email protected]: Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, A.M., & Jones, S.H. (2019). The queer life of things: Performance, affect, and the more-than-human. Lexington Books. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rmit/detail.action?docID=5774651.Google Scholar
Jackson, Y., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives (1st ed.). UK: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Keogh, B. (2013). Just making things and being alive about it: The queer games scene. Retrieved from https://www.polygon.com/features/2013/5/24/4341042/the-queer-games-scene.Google Scholar
Lysgaard, J.A., & Bengtsson, S. (2020). Dark pedagogy - speculative realism and environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 14531465. DOI 10.1080/13504622.2020.1739230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, M. (2020). The waves carve their own desires”: The affects and agencies of intramedial performance. Research in Drama Education, 25(3), 364377. DOI 10.1080/13569783.2020.1766952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russworm, T.M. (2018). A call to action for video game studies in an age of reanimated white supremacy. The Velvet Light Trap, 81(1), 7376. DOI 10.7560/VLT8106.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, E.A. (2021). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 39. DOI 10.1177/1077800419863005.Google Scholar
St Pierre, E.A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 316. DOI 10.1177/1077800418772634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C.A. (2019). Each intra-action matters: Towards a posthuman ethics for enlarging response-ability in higher education pedagogic practice-ings. In Bozalek, V., Braidotti, R., Shefer, T. & Zembylas, M. (Eds.), Socially just pedagogies: posthumanist, feminist and materialist perspectives in higher education. Bloomsbury Publishing, 10.5040/9781350032910)Google Scholar
Watts, J. (2020). Bruno Latour: This is a global catastrophe that has come from within. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/06/bruno-latour-coronavirus-gaia-hypothesis-climate-crisis.Google Scholar