Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:32:06.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a New Cosmology of Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Murray May
Murray May*
Affiliation:
Department of Arts, Heritage & Environment, Canberra
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this article is to review and integrate a number of concepts and perspectives recently developed or revived which challenge society's current attitudes towards the environment. The concepts discussed include, for example, ecophilosophy and deep ecology, holism, cultural transformation, the Gaia hypothesis, transpersonalism and world, national and state conservation strategies.

It is concluded that the notion of living in harmony with nature is central to any view spirituality. The implications of this view in terms of individual personal action are discussed.

Type
Feature Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 4 , September 1988 , pp. 9 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

References

Australia, A National Conservation Strategy for Australia, Canberra, AGPS, 1984.Google Scholar
Balasubramaniam, A. “Creative synergy: A guiding principle for environmental education”. In Balasubramaniam, A. (ed.). Issues in Environmental Education in Asean, Singapore, Regional Institute of Higher Education and Development, 1985.Google Scholar
Capra, F. The Turning Point, London, Fontana, 1982.Google Scholar
Coombs, H. “Sustainable society will need a new ethic of responsibility”, Habitat, 1986, 14(1), 29–31.Google Scholar
Devall, B. & Sessions, G. Deep Ecology, Layton, U.S.A., Gibbs Smith, 1985.Google Scholar
Fox, W. “Deep ecology: A new philosophy of our time?” The Ecologist, 1984, 14(5/6), 194–204.Google Scholar
Fox, W. “Towards a deeper ecology?” Habitat, 1985, 13(4), 26–28.Google Scholar
Fromm, F. To Have or To Be? London, Abacus, 1979.Google Scholar
Greenall, A. “A new beginning for environmental education in Australia”, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 1985, 1(2), 13–15.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. (ed.). Geographical Education: Reflection and Action, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. “The Daintree rainforest: Developing political literacy through an environmental issue”. In Fein, J. & Gerber, R. Teaching Geography for a Better World, Brisbane, Jacaranda, 1986.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. “Introduction to ‘Elements’.” In Myers, N. (ed.), The Gaia Atlas of Planet Management, London, Pan, 1985.Google Scholar
Maher, M. “Censorship, consensus and challenge - environmental education in schools in Australia”, Social Alternatives, 04 1986, 5(2), 23–32.Google Scholar
O'Connor, P. Understanding Jung Understanding Yourself, London, Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
Porritt, J. Seeing Green, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. “Person, society and planet: The changing context for health”, Health Education, Winter, 1985a, 2–9.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. Future Work, Hants, (U.K.), Gower, 1985b.Google Scholar
Robottom, I. “Education for the environment?” Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 07 1984, 1(1), 11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roszak, T. Unfinished Animal, London, Faber & Faber, 1976.Google Scholar
Roszak, T. Person/Planet, London, Gollancz, 1979.Google Scholar
Russell, P. The Awakening Earth, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1982.Google Scholar
Skolimowski, H. Eco-Philosophy, London, Marion Boyars, 1981.Google Scholar
Wellwood, J. “Self-knowledge as the basis for an integrative psychology”, Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1979, 11(1), 23–40.Google Scholar